9.2 Background: Constituency in Degree Constructions

In Chris Barker & Pauline I. Jacobson (eds.), Direct Compositionality. Oxford University Press. pp. 14--306 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

DegP scope revisited.Sigrid Beck - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (3):227-272.
Strange Relatives of the Third Kind.Alexander Grosu & Fred Landman - 1998 - Natural Language Semantics 6 (2):125-170.
Some New Lattice Constructions in High R. E. Degrees.Heinrich Rolletschek - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (3):395-430.
Forcing minimal degree of constructibility.Haim Judah & Saharon Shelah - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):769-782.
Diagonalization in degree constructions.D. Posner & R. Epstein - 1978 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (2):280-283.
Parasitic degree phrases.Jon Nissenbaum & Bernhard Schwarz - 2011 - Natural Language Semantics 19 (1):1-38.
A formal treatment of the causative constructions in chinese.Chongli Zou & Nianxi Xia - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (2):307-316.
How Involved do You Want to be in a Non-symmetric Relationship?Fraser MacBride - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (1):1-16.
The Meaning of Too, Enough, and So... That.Cécile Meier - 2003 - Natural Language Semantics 11 (1):69-107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references