Must we have full moral status throughout our existence? A reply to Alfonso Gomez-lobo

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):297-310 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Those who are morally opposed to abortion generally make several pivotal assumptions. This paper focuses on the assumption that we have full moral status throughout our existence. Coupled with the assumption that we come into existence at conception, the assumption about moral status entails that all human fetuses have full moral status, including a right to life. Is the assumption about moral status correct? In addressing this question, I respond to several arguments advanced, in this journal and other venues, by Alfonso Gómez-Lobo. Gómez-Lobo's reasoning resolves into two basic arguments: (1) an appeal to the practical necessity of early moral protection and (2) an appeal to our kind membership and potentiality. I respond to these in turn before offering further reflections

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ergon Inference.Alfonso Gomez-Lobo - 1989 - Phronesis 34 (1):170-184.
Inviolability at any age.Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):311-320.
Individuality and Human Beginnings: A Reply to David DeGrazia.Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):457-462.
The status of moral status.Benjamin Sachs - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):87-104.
Moral Status As a Matter of Degree?David DeGrazia - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):181-198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#204,784)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David DeGrazia
George Washington University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references