Richard Peters and Valuing Authenticity
Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):209-222 (2009)
| Abstract | Richard Peters has been praised for the authenticity of his philosophy, and inquiry into aspects of the development of his philosophy reveals a profound authenticity. Yet authenticity is something he seems not to favour. The apparent paradox is resolved by observing historical changes in the understanding of authenticity as an important value. Possibilities are noted for further explorations as to how to understand and value it as an educational ideal | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJan Christoph Bublitz & Reinhard Merkel (2009). Autonomy and Authenticity of Enhanced Personality Traits. Bioethics 23 (6):360-374.
Lauren Bialystok (2011). Refuting Polonius: Sincerity, Authenticity, and 'Shtick'. Philosophical Papers 40 (2):207 - 231.
Rick Anthony Furtak (2003). The Virtues of Authenticity. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):423-438.
Lionel Trilling (1974/1980). Sincerity and Authenticity. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Neil Levy (2011). Enhancing Authenticity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):308-318.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-09-10Total downloads17 ( #72,058 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
