The autonomy of the contracting partners: An argument for heuristic contractarian business ethics [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):347-361 (2006)
Due to the domain characteristics of business ethics, a contractarian theory for business ethics will need to be essentially different from the contract model as it is applied to other domains. Much of the current criticism of contractarian business ethics (CBE) can be traced back to autonomy, one of its three boundary conditions. After explaining why autonomy is so important, this article considers the notion carefully vis à vis the contracting partners in the contractarian approaches in business ethics. Autonomy is too demanding a condition for the realm of CBE. But a less stringent version of the contract may be possible, a version which uses the contract as a heuristic device, which merely requires moral responsibility. Furthermore, it is argued that views of (human) agency and the moral subject should be made explicit in such a theory.
|Keywords||autonomy contract Theory contractarian business ethics exit option ISCT|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ingo Pies, Markus Beckmann & Stefan Hielscher (2010). Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship: An Ordonomic Approach to Business Ethics in the Age of Globalization. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (2):265 - 278.
Julia Roloff & Michael S. Aßländer (2010). Corporate Autonomy and Buyer—Supplier Relationships: The Case of Unsafe Mattel Toys. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 97 (4):517 - 534.
Frances Chua & Asheq Rahman (2011). Institutional Pressures and Ethical Reckoning by Business Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (2):307 - 329.
Paul Neiman (2013). A Social Contract for International Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):75-90.
Similar books and articles
Ben Wempe (2009). Extant Social Contracts and the Question of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):741 - 750.
Louke van Wensveen Siker (1989). Christ and Business: A Typology for Christian Business Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11):883 - 888.
Louke Wensveen Sikevanr (1989). Christ and Business: A Typology for Christian Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11).
Jerry M. Calton (2006). Social Contracting in a Pluralist Process of Moral Sense Making: A Dialogic Twist on the ISCT. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):329 - 346.
Pedro Francés-Gómez (2003). Some Difficulties in Sacconi's View About Corporate Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (2):165 - 180.
Bill Shaw (1995). Virtue Ethics and Contractarianism. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (2):297-312.
Thomas Donaldson (1995). Contractarian Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (2):173-186.
Ben Wempe (2005). In Defense of a Self-Disciplined, Domain-Specific Social Contract Theory of Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):113-135.
Ben Wempe (2008). Four Design Criteria for Any Future Contractarian Theory of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):697 - 714.
Gjalt De Graaf (2006). The Autonomy of the Contracting Partners: An Argument for Heuristic Contractarian Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):347 - 361.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #263,048 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #183,308 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?