David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in Christian Ethics 25 (3):295-311 (2012)
This article addresses the apparent tension in O’Donovan’s overall argument in The Ways of Judgment (2005): a tension between his constructive account of judgement (central to Parts I and II), and his endorsement of Jesus’ injunction not to judge (central to Part III). After clarifying exactly what kind of judgement O’Donovan intends in identifying judgement as the core political practice, the article highlights a few key aspects of O’Donovan’s political theology that might mitigate, or even take away, the tension in his argument. The article then goes on to address a remaining issue, namely that O’Donovan seems to imply that Christians are to judge only in private, thereby leaving all public judgement to the secular authorities. In response to this impression the article will affirm, in the light of Rom. 12:1-8, that the church does exercise public judgement, by corporately discerning, formulating and enacting the implications of God’s judgement in Christ
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tuija Parvikko (1999). Committed to Think, Judge and Act : Hannah Arendt's Ideal-Typical Approach to Human Faculties. In Joke J. Hermsen & Dana Richard Villa (eds.), The Judge and the Spectator: Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy. Peeters
Kjell Johan Sæbø (2009). Judgment Ascriptions. Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (4):327-352.
A. S. McGrade (2002). From Irenaeus to Grotius: A Sourcebook in Christian Political Thought, by Oliver O'Donovan and Joan Lockwood O'Donovan (Eds). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1999. 838 Pp. Hb. No Price. ISBN 0-8028-3876-. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 15 (1):152-153.
Robert Gibbs (2009). Verdict and Sentence Cover and Levinas on the Robe of Justice. In Desmond Manderson (ed.), Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan 73-89.
Aaron Stalnaker (2008). Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
Garrett Cullity (1999). Virtue Ethics, Theory, and Warrant. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):277-294.
Albertjan Tollenaar, A. T. Marseille & Kars de Graaf, Establishing Facts by the Administrative Judge.
John R. Williams (2006). Bonds of Imperfection: Christian Politics, Past and Present by Oliver O'Donovan and Joan Lockwood O'Donovan. Heythrop Journal 47 (4):657–658.
Michael O'Donovan-Anderson (1996). Wittgenstein and Rousseau on the Context of Justification. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (3):75-92.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2000). Review: Longuenesse, Kant and the Capacity to Judge. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 109 (4):645-648.
Added to index2012-07-25
Total downloads8 ( #381,053 of 1,792,244 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,595 of 1,792,244 )
How can I increase my downloads?