David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 46 (4):492-526 (2001)
In this paper I propose a reading of Plotinus Enneads VI.1-3 [41-43] On the genera of being which regards this treatise as a coherent whole in which Aristotle's Categories is explored in a way that turns it into a decisive contribution to Plotinus' Platonic ontology. In addition, I claim that Porphyry's Isagoge and commentaries on the Categories start by adopting Plotinus' point of view, including his notion of genus, and proceed by explaining its consequences for a more detailed reading of the Categories . After Plotinus' integration of the Categories into the Platonic frame of thought Porphyry saw the possibilities of exploiting the Peripatetic tradition both as a means to support the Platonic interpretation of the Categories and as a source for solutions to traditional questions. His allegiance to a division of being into ten, and his emphasis on semantics rather than ontology can be explained from this orientation. In the light of our investigation the alleged disagreement between Plotinus and Porphyry on the Categories changes its appearance completely. There are differences, but these can be best explained as confirmation and extension of Plotinus' perspective on the Categories and its role in Platonism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marije Martijn (2010). Proclus on the Order of Philosophy of Nature. Synthese 174 (2):205 - 223.
Michael J. Griffin* (2012). What Has Aristotelian Dialectic to Offer a Neoplatonist? A Possible Sample of Iamblichus at Simplicius on the Categories 12,10-13,12. [REVIEW] International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6 (2):173-185.
Similar books and articles
Frans A. J. de Haas (2001). Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's Categories? Phronesis 46 (4):492-526.
Frans A. J. De Haas (2001). Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's "Categories"? Phronesis 46 (4):492 - 526.
Robbert van den Berg (2010). Procheirisis: Porphyry Sent. 16 and Plotinus on the Similes of the Waxen Block and the Aviary. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):163-180.
Porphyry (1992). On Aristotle's Categories. Cornell University Press.
Porphyry (1988). Porphyry's Launching-Points to the Realm of Mind: An Introduction to the Neoplatonic Philosophy of Plotinus. Phanes Press.
Seamus O'Neill (2011). Porphyry the Apostate: Assessing Porphyry's Reaction to Plotinus's Doctrine of the One. Heythrop Journal 52 (1):1-10.
Michael J. Griffin (2012). What Has Aristotelian Dialectic to Offer a Neoplatonist? A Possible Sample of Iamblichus at Simplicius on the Categories 12,10-13,12. [REVIEW] International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6 (2):173-185.
Lawrence P. Schrenk (1989). Aristotle's Categories and Porphyry. Review of Metaphysics 43 (1):155-157.
John Dillon (2010). Intellect and the One in Porphyrys Sententiae. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (1):27-35.
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1967). Aristotle. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
S. Marc Cohen & Gareth B. Matthews (1991). On Aristotle's Categories. Cornell University Press.
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1968). Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays. Melbourne, Macmillan.
James Wilberding (2008). Porphyry and Plotinus on the Seed. Phronesis 53 (s 4-5):406-432.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads14 ( #241,418 of 1,790,408 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #325,851 of 1,790,408 )
How can I increase my downloads?