David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 20 (01):92- (1970)
Ever since the first edition of the De anima by Trendelenburg, modern scholars have been in trouble as to the exact interpretation of this phrase and especially of the expression Although the right one, as we think, was suggested a long time ago by Shorey, a restatement of it seems justified, because the later treatment of the problem in the edition of Sir David Ross has apparently established a different communis opinio. The first detailed examination of the whole passage was given by Bonitz, who saw no other possibility of making the text render the required sense than to alter This is indeed ‘a rather improbable corruption’. It is also clear that such an emendation of a reading defended by the consensus of all our manuscripts should only be accepted if there really is no other way out
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. D. G. Evans (1995). Aristotle's De Anima Michael Durrant (Ed.): Aristotle's De Anima in Focus. Pp. Xiii+225. London, New York: Routledge, 1993. £35 (Paper, £11.99). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (01):60-61.
Aristotle & William David Ross (1963/1976). De Anima. Clarendon Press.
D. J. Furley (1963). Aristotle, de Anima Aristotle: De Anima. Edited with Introduction and Commentary by Sir David Ross. Pp. 338. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961. Cloth, 50s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (01):46-49.
Aristotle (1993). De Anima: Books II and III with Passages From. Oxford University Press on Demand.
John Bowin (2012). Aristotle on 'First Transitions' in De Anima II 5. Apeiron 45 (3):262-282.
Martha Craven Nussbaum & Amélie Rorty (eds.) (1992). Essays on Aristotle's De Anima. Oxford University Press.
John Bowin (2011). Aristotle on Various Types of Alteration in De Anima II 5. Phronesis 56 (2):138-161.
W. D. Ross (1908). Hicks's Aristotle, De Anima Aristotle, De Anima, with Translation, Introduction and Notes. By R. D. Hicks, M.A., Fellow and Late Lecturer of Trinity College, Cambridge. Cambridge: University Press, 1907. Pp. Lxxxiii + 626. 18s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 22 (07):218-221.
Ronald M. Polansky (2007). Aristotle's de Anima. Cambridge University Press.
Catherine Osborne (1998). Perceiving White and Sweet (Again): Aristotle, De Anima 3.7, 431a20-B1. Classical Quarterly 48 (02):433-446.
Catherine Osborne (1983). Aristotle, De Anima 3. 2: How Do We Perceive That We See and Hear? Classical Quarterly 33 (02):401-411.
H. J. Blumenthal (1996). Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of the De Anima. Cornell University Press.
Aristotle & William David Ross (1956). De anima. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads5 ( #260,993 of 1,679,301 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #183,793 of 1,679,301 )
How can I increase my downloads?