David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 29 (3):253-268 (1962)
Theoretical problems concerning concepts of systems and measurement of behavior were encountered during experimental studies of the effects of electrical stimulation of the brain on the social behavior of a monkey colony. General problems involved in the description and measurement of behavior of natural systems, and especially of organisms are discussed. In animals with differentiated brain the general process of stimulation may be divided into four subprocesses: input, throughput, transput and output. Categories of behavior, temporal and spatial units, and logical rules of homogeneity for sorting data and comparing measurements and categories, are discussed. Simple behavioral units are divided into: 1. Individual a. static or postural b. dynamic or gestural 2. Social a. static b. dynamic. Complex behavior is divided into: 1. Simultaneous 2. Sequential 3. Syntactic 4. Roles. The process of interpretation of data by the observer is assumed to be dependent upon actual behavior of the system, techniques of observation and experimentation, theoretical and technical processes of analysis, and synthesis and integration of data. Expression of behavior in mathematical terms insures greater accuracy than descriptive methods and enables data to be processed with computers
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
François Tonneau (2005). Antirealist Arguments in Behavior Analysis. Behavior and Philosophy 33:55 - 65.
H. S. Pennypacker (2001). Are Theories of Selection Necessary? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):549-550.
David W. Hollar, John Hattie, Bert Goldman & James Lancaster (2000). Developing Assessment Procedures and Assessing Two Models of Escalation Behavior Among Community College Administrators. Theory and Decision 49 (1):1-24.
Silvia A. Bunge & Jonathan D. Wallis (eds.) (2008). Neuroscience of Rule-Guided Behavior. Oxford University Press.
A. Charles Catania (2003). Why Behavior Should Matter to Linguists. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):670-672.
Michael J. O'Fallon & Kenneth D. Butterfield (2012). The Influence of Unethical Peer Behavior on Observers' Unethical Behavior: A Social Cognitive Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2):117-131.
Greg Downey (2005). The Contribution of Cross-Cultural Study to Dynamic Systems Modeling of Emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):201-202.
Patrick Van Kenhove, Kristof de Wulf & Sarah Steenhaut (2003). The Relationship Between Consumers' Unethical Behavior and Customer Loyalty in a Retail Environment. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):261 - 278.
Andreas Keil & Thomas Elbert (2000). Physiological Units and Behavioral Elements: Dynamic Brains Relate to Dynamic Behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):406-407.
Zoltan Domotor & Vadim Batitsky (2008). The Analytic Versus Representational Theory of Measurement: A Philosophy of Science Perspective. Measurement Science Review 8 (6):129-146.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #178,053 of 1,410,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #178,988 of 1,410,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?