Habermas and occidental rationalism: The politics of identity, social learning, and the cultural limits of moral universalism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 15 (1):30-59 (1997)
While Habermas's theory of communicative action is deeply critical of all kinds of ethnocentrism, proposing a discursive concept of universal morality which transcends culture, a residual Eurocentrism still pervades it. Habermas's theory rests on a notion of modernity which is tied to Occidental rationalism, and when viewed in the global context or in the context of deeply divided societies it is problematic. The theory fails to grasp that universal morality can be articulated in more than one cultural form and in more than one logic of development. However, his theory can be defended against its Eurocentric bias if it shifts its emphasis from a de-contexualized and transcendental critique of communication rooted in Occidental rationalism to a cosmopolitan model of contemporary cultural transformation. Crucial to that task is a weaker notion of rationality which recognizes that the problem of universality is also a cognitive cultural problem and not just a normative one. Bringing culture and identity to the foreground will involve making room for a level of discourse focused less on consensual agreement than on cultural understanding.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Van Den Berg (2004). Be Prestige- Resilient! A Contextual Ethics of Cultural Identity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (2):197 - 214.
Paul Van Den Berg (2004). Be Prestige-Resilient! A Contextual Ethics of Cultural Identity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (2):197-214.
Agnes S. Ku (2000). Revisiting the Notion of "Public" in Habermas's Theory-Toward a Theory of Politics of Public Credibility. Sociological Theory 18 (2):216-240.
James Gordon Finlayson (2000). Modernity and Morality in Habermas's Discourse Ethics. Inquiry 43 (3):319 – 340.
James Swindal (1999). Reflection Revisited: Jürgen Habermas's Discursive Theory of Truth. Fordham University Press.
Roger Foster (2006). Rethinking the Critique of Instrumental Reason. Social Philosophy Today 22:169-184.
Dieter Freundlieb (1988). Rationalism V. Irrationalism? Habermas's Response to Foucault. Inquiry 31 (2):171 – 192.
Kenneth H. Tucker (1993). Aesthetics, Play, and Cultural Memory: Giddens and Habermas on the Postmodern Challenge. Sociological Theory 11 (2):194-211.
Kyung-Man Kim (2011). Habermas on Understanding: Virtual Participation, Dialogue and the Universality of Truth. [REVIEW] Human Studies 34 (4):393-406.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #74,438 of 1,725,580 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,753 of 1,725,580 )
How can I increase my downloads?