How do Universities Make Progress? Stakeholder-Related Mechanisms Affecting Adoption of Sustainability in University Curricula

Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1):103-116 (2013)
This paper develops a theoretical model to explicate stakeholder-related mechanisms that affect university adoption of sustainability in curricula. This work combines stakeholder and institutional theories so as to extend both. By examining change in the university context wherein there is confusion about sustainability adoption, this research adds to previous institutional theory focusing on strongly contested practices, primarily in the for-profit firm setting. Sustainability is a transformational challenge and may be adopted reactively or proactively. Also, stakeholder theory is extended in a mixed profit and non-profit context. Propositions suggest how the extent of embeddedness affects an organizations’ selection of stakeholders, consequently affecting the type of adoption. This facilitates a greater understanding of why two competing definitions of stakeholders may operate. Moreover, extrinsic and intrinsic motivations are discussed as affecting adoption in different ways. A responsible leader organization is newly defined and intrinsic motivation is proposed as underlying its choice of the widest set of stakeholders leading to broad, proactive adoption
Keywords Adoption  Institutional theory  Responsible leader organization  Stakeholder theory  Universities  Sustainability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1577-y
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
R. Edward Freeman (2000). Business Ethics at the Millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):169-180.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
David Saiia (2005). Stakeholder Salience, Shifting Networks and Sustainability. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:342-346.
Nicholas Maxwell (2012). Does Science Provide Us with the Methodological Key to Wisdom? Philosophia, First Part of 'Arguing for Wisdom in the University' 40 (4):664-673.
Dominic Kaeslin, Ruth Schmitt & Jerry Calton (2007). Decentered Stakeholder Theory. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:448-452.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

3 ( #665,766 of 1,902,769 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #446,006 of 1,902,769 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.