How do Universities Make Progress? Stakeholder-Related Mechanisms Affecting Adoption of Sustainability in University Curricula
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1):103-116 (2013)
This paper develops a theoretical model to explicate stakeholder-related mechanisms that affect university adoption of sustainability in curricula. This work combines stakeholder and institutional theories so as to extend both. By examining change in the university context wherein there is confusion about sustainability adoption, this research adds to previous institutional theory focusing on strongly contested practices, primarily in the for-profit firm setting. Sustainability is a transformational challenge and may be adopted reactively or proactively. Also, stakeholder theory is extended in a mixed profit and non-profit context. Propositions suggest how the extent of embeddedness affects an organizations’ selection of stakeholders, consequently affecting the type of adoption. This facilitates a greater understanding of why two competing definitions of stakeholders may operate. Moreover, extrinsic and intrinsic motivations are discussed as affecting adoption in different ways. A responsible leader organization is newly defined and intrinsic motivation is proposed as underlying its choice of the widest set of stakeholders leading to broad, proactive adoption
|Keywords||Adoption Institutional theory Responsible leader organization Stakeholder theory Universities Sustainability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
R. Edward Freeman (2000). Business Ethics at the Millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):169-180.
Elisabet Garriga & Domènec Melé (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):51-71.
Thomas Maak (2007). Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):329 - 343.
Thomas Maak & Nicola M. Pless (2006). Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society – a Relational Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):99 - 115.
Christine Parsons & Brian Fidler (2005). A New Theory of Educational Change: Punctuated Equilibrium: The Case of the Internationalisation of Higher Education Institutions. British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4):447 - 465.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Saiia (2005). Stakeholder Salience, Shifting Networks and Sustainability. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:342-346.
Nicholas Maxwell (2011). Creating a Better World: Towards the University of Wisdom. In Ronald Barnett (ed.), The Future University: Ideas and Possibilities. Routledge.
James W. Sheppard (2003). The Nectar is in the Journey: Pragmatism, Progress, and the Promise of Incrementalism. Philosophy and Geography 6 (2):167 – 187.
Kevin Gibson (2012). Stakeholders and Sustainability: An Evolving Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):15-25.
Nicholas Maxwell (2012). Does Science Provide Us with the Methodological Key to Wisdom? Philosophia, First Part of 'Arguing for Wisdom in the University' 40 (4):664-673.
Shawneequa L. Callier (2012). Swabbing Students: Should Universities Be Allowed to Facilitate Educational DNA Testing? American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):32-40.
José Luis Fernández Fernández & Anna Bajo Sanjuán (2010). The Presence of Business Ethics and CSR in the Higher Education Curricula for Executives. Journal of Business Ethics Education 7:25-38.
Dominic Kaeslin, Ruth Schmitt & Jerry Calton (2007). Decentered Stakeholder Theory. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:448-452.
Alfred Frederick Horrigan (1950). Metaphysics as a Principle of Order in the University Curriculum. Washington, Catholic University of America Press.
Laura Dunham, R. Edward Freeman & Jeanne Liedtka (2006). Enhancing Stakeholder Practice. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (1):23-42.
Robert A. Phillips & Joel Reichart (2000). The Environment as a Stakeholder? A Fairness-Based Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):185 - 197.
Marcel van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):107-119.
Marcel Van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):107 - 119.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-11-27
Total downloads1 ( #440,892 of 1,101,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #292,019 of 1,101,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?