David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 10 (1):57-69 (2008)
Trust between transaction partners in cyberspace has come to be considered a distinct possibility. In this article the focus is on the conditions for its creation by way of assuming, not inferring trust. After a survey of its development over the years (in the writings of authors like Luhmann, Baier, Gambetta, and Pettit), this mechanism of trust is explored in a study of personal journal blogs. After a brief presentation of some technicalities of blogging and authors’ motives for writing their diaries, I try to answer the question, ‘Why do the overwhelming majority of web diarists dare to expose the intimate details of their lives to the world at large?’ It is argued that the mechanism of assuming trust is at play: authors simply assume that future visitors to their blog will be sympathetic readers, worthy of their intimacies. This assumption then may create a self-fulfilling cycle of mutual admiration. Thereupon, this phenomenon of blogging about one’s intimacies is linked to Calvert’s theory of ‘mediated voyeurism’ and Mathiesen’s notion of ‘synopticism’. It is to be interpreted as a form of ‘empowering exhibitionism’ that reaffirms subjectivity. Various types of ‘synopticon’ are distinguished, each drawing the line between public and private differently. In the most ‘radical’ synopticon blogging proceeds in total transparency and the concept of privacy is declared obsolete; the societal gaze of surveillance is proudly returned and nullified. Finally it is shown that, in practice, these conceptions of blogging are put to a severe test, while authors often have to cope with known people from ‘real life’ complaining, and with ‘trolling’ strangers.
|Keywords||blogs diaries exhibitionism panopticism privacy surveillance synopticism trust voyeurism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul B. de Laat (2012). Open Source Production of Encyclopedias: Editorial Policies at the Intersection of Organizational and Epistemological Trust. Social Epistemology 26 (1):71-103.
Paul B. de Laat (2010). How Can Contributors to Open-Source Communities Be Trusted? On the Assumption, Inference, and Substitution of Trust. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):327-341.
Paul B. Laat (2010). How Can Contributors to Open-Source Communities Be Trusted? On the Assumption, Inference, and Substitution of Trust. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):327-341.
Similar books and articles
G. Oakes (1990). The Sales Process and the Paradoxes of Trust. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (8):671 - 679.
Matteo Turilli, Antonino Vaccaro & Mariarosaria Taddeo (2010). The Case of Online Trust. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):333-345.
Paul B. de Laat (2005). Trusting Virtual Trust. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):167-180.
Colin Rule & Larry Friedberg (2005). The Appropriate Role of Dispute Resolution in Building Trust Online. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):193-205.
Harry Hummels & Hans E. Roosendaal (2001). Trust in Scientific Publishing. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (2):87 - 100.
Sonja Grabner-Kraeuter (2002). The Role of Consumers' Trust in Online-Shopping. Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):43 - 50.
Daryl Koehn (2003). The Nature of and Conditions for Online Trust. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1/2):3 - 19.
Robert C. Solomon (1998). Creating Trust. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Trudy Govier (1992). Trust, Distrust, and Feminist Theory. Hypatia 7 (1):16 - 33.
Stine Lomborg (2012). Negotiating Privacy Through Phatic Communication. A Case Study of the Blogging Self. Philosophy and Technology 25 (3):415-434.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #39,233 of 1,088,873 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,873 )
How can I increase my downloads?