Open Source Production of Encyclopedias: Editorial Policies at the Intersection of Organizational and Epistemological Trust
Social Epistemology 26 (1):71-103 (2012)
| Abstract | The ideas behind open source software are currently applied to the production of encyclopedias. A sample of six English text-based, neutral-point-of-view, online encyclopedias of the kind are identified: h2g2, Wikipedia, Scholarpedia, Encyclopedia of Earth, Citizendium and Knol. How do these projects deal with the problem of trusting their participants to behave as competent and loyal encyclopedists? Editorial policies for soliciting and processing content are shown to range from high discretion to low discretion; that is, from granting unlimited trust to limited trust. Their conceptions of the proper role for experts are also explored and it is argued that to a great extent they determine editorial policies. Subsequently, internal discussions about quality guarantee at Wikipedia are rendered. All indications are that review and ?super-review? of new edits will become policy, to be performed by Wikipedians with a better reputation. Finally, while for encyclopedias the issue of organizational trust largely coincides with epistemological trust, a link is made with theories about the acceptance of testimony. It is argued that both non-reductionist views (the ?acceptance principle? and the ?assurance view?) and reductionist ones (an appeal to background conditions, and a?newly defined??expertise view?) have been implemented in editorial strategies over the past decade | |||||||||
| Keywords | encyclopedia open source testimony trust Wikipedia | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul B. de Laat (2010). How Can Contributors to Open-Source Communities Be Trusted? On the Assumption, Inference, and Substitution of Trust. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):327-341.
Paul Faulkner (2011). Knowledge on Trust. OUP Oxford.
Deborah Perron Tollefsen (2009). WIKIPEDIA and the Epistemology of Testimony. Episteme 6 (1):8-24.
P. D. Magnus (2009). On Trusting WIKIPEDIA. Episteme 6 (1):74-90.
P. D. Magnus (2006). Epistemology and the Wikipedia. North American Computing and Philosophy Conference.
Raminta Pučėtaitė & Anna-Maija Lämsä (2008). Building Organizational Trust with Ethical Organizational Practices. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:55-64.
Edward Hinchman (forthcoming). Can Trust Itself Ground a Reason to Believe the Trusted? Abstracta, Special Issue VII.
Kristina Rolin (2002). Gender and Trust in Science. Hypatia 17 (4):95-118.
Matteo Turilli, Antonino Vaccaro & Mariarosaria Taddeo (2010). The Case of Online Trust. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):333-345.
Doran Smolkin (2008). Puzzles About Trust. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):431-449.
Doran Smolkin (2008). Puzzles About Trust. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):431-449.
Robert C. Solomon (1998). Creating Trust. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Waymond Rodgers (2010). Three Primary Trust Pathways Underlying Ethical Considerations. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):83 - 93.
Robert A. Gehring (2006). The Institutionalization of Open Source. Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):54-73.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-12-04Total downloads10 ( #106,370 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
