David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 32 (1):17-32 (2010)
According to Michael Soulé, the debate over whether we should or should not actively manage our nature preserves has driven a deep wedge between “wilderness purists,” who advocate a hands-off approach to nature, and “nature managers,” who want to give nature a helping hand whenever the “fullness of the biota” is under threat. Although both camps share the same formal goal, i.e., preserving “authentic nature,” managers and purists have differing views about what the “authenticity of nature” stands for. By introducing a third way of conceptualizing the authenticity of nature that holds the middle-ground between the authenticity of the purists and the managers—namely, natural areas as authentic relics—a bridge can be found between the two positions. As in the case of heath restorations in Flanders, Belgium, the theory of relics can provide an alternative way in which the concept of authenticity is used when evaluating preservation or restoration projects. Moreover, the conception of natural areas as relics is already tacitly at work within certain preservation and/or restoration practices. A comparison of the theory of relics with Robert Elliot’s anti-restoration thesis as put forward in Faking Nature shows that the theory of relics can, to a large degree, save Elliot’s anti-restorationist’s stance in a world that is waking up to the reality of the “end of nature,” while at the same time softening the rigid rejection of all restorative practices implied in the anti-restoration thesis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Vincent McGinnis (1996). Deep Ecology and the Foundations of Restoration. Inquiry 39 (2):203 – 217.
J. Thompson (2001). Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):290 – 291.
Glenn Deliège (2007). Toward a Richer Account of Restorative Practices. Environmental Philosophy 4 (1/2):135-147.
Sheila Lintott (2011). Preservation, Passivity, and Pessimism. Ethics and the Environment 16 (2):95-114.
Eric S. Higgs (1996). The Politics of Ecological Restoration. Environmental Ethics 18 (3):227-247.
Andrew Light & Eric Higgs (1996). The Politics of Ecological Restoration. Environmental Ethics 18 (3):227-247.
Chris Klassen (2011). Nature Religion and the Ethics of Authenticity. Environmental Ethics 33 (3):295-305.
Robert Elliot (1982). Faking Nature. Inquiry 25 (1):81 – 93.
Max Oelschlaeger (2007). Ecological Restoration, Aldo Leopold, and Beauty. Environmental Philosophy 4 (1/2):149-161.
Steven Vogel (2003). The Nature of Artifacts. Environmental Ethics 25 (2):149-168.
Susan M. Parrillo (2008). Fake Nature. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:123-130.
Robert Elliot (2005). Instrumental Value in Nature as a Basis for the Intrinsic Value of Nature as a Whole. Environmental Ethics 27 (1):43-56.
Charles E. Larmore (2010). The Practices of the Self. The University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads14 ( #241,418 of 1,790,567 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #433,815 of 1,790,567 )
How can I increase my downloads?