David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):181-220 (2008)
This article offers a tentative deconstruction of Heidegger’s account of the “modern,” that is, the “Cartesian,” “subject.” It argues that subjectivity, understood as the idea of some “thing” that is both the owner of certain mental states and the agent of certain activities, is a medieval theological construct, based on two conflicting models of the mind (nous, mens) inherited from ancient philosophy and theology: the Aristotelian and the Augustinian (or perichoretic) one, developed in connection with such problems as that of the two wills in the incarnate Christ. Starting with Nietzsche’s criticism of the “superstition of logicians” (the belief that“the subject I is the condition of the predicate think”) and Peter Strawson’s question in Individuals (“Why are one’s states of consciousness ascribed to anything at all?”), the article discusses Peter Olivi’s and Thomas Aquinas’s treatments of the problem, as well as the principle invoked to resolve it: actiones sunt suppositorum, “actions belong to subjects.” Against this background, the discussion refers to Heidegger’s notion of “subjecticity” and Armstrong’s “attribute-theory” in order to reappraise the Hobbesian and Leibnizian contributions to the history of the Self
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christian Rode (2011). The concept of inner experience in Peter John Olivi. Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):123-141.
Weimin Mo (2007). Cogito : From Descartes to Sartre. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):247-264.
William McNeill (2004). The Poverty of the Regent. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):285-296.
Ben Golder, Rethinking the Subject of Postmodern Feminist Legal Theory: Towards a Feminist Foucaultian Jurisprudence.
Allegra De Laurentiis (2005). Subjects in the Ancient and Modern World: On Hegel's Theory of Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Edward Comstock (2011). Idiocy, Attention, and the Normal Scholastic Prototype. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (9):909-923.
Gert J. J. Biesta (1999). Radical Intersubjectivity: Reflections on the ÂDifferentâ Foundation of Education. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 18 (4):203-220.
David S. Stern (2000). The Return of the Subject?: Power, Reflexivity and Agency. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (5):109-122.
Marina Bykova (2007). The Philosophy of Subjectivity From Descartes to Hegel. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:147-153.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #51,686 of 1,099,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #114,795 of 1,099,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?