Graduate studies at Western
First Things 96:25-31 (1999)
|Abstract||For two hundred years materialist philosophers have argued that man is some sort of machine. The claim began with French materialists of the Enlightenment such as Pierre Cabanis, Julien La Mettrie, and Baron d’Holbach (La Mettrie even wrote a book titled Man the Machine). Likewise contemporary materialists like Marvin Minsky, Daniel Dennett, and Patricia Churchland claim that the motions and modifications of matter are sufficient to account for all human experiences, even our interior and cognitive ones. Whereas the Enlightenment philosophes might have thought of humans in terms of gear mechanisms and fluid flows, contemporary materialists think of humans in terms of neurological systems and computational devices. The idiom has been updated, but the underlying impulse to reduce mind to matter remains unchanged|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jack Copeland (1997). The Broad Conception of Computation. American Behavioral Scientist 40 (6):690-716.
Johnny H. Søraker (2005). Man Vs. Machine – An Exploration of the Concept 'Continuity'. Dissertation, NTNU
Steven Pinker (2005). So How Does the Mind Work? Mind and Language 20 (1):1-38.
Daniel von Wachter (2009). What Kind of Modality Does the Materialist Need for His Supervenience Claim? In Alexander Battyany & E. Elitzur (eds.), Irreducibly Conscious. Selected Papers on Consciousness. Winter.
L. Böök (1999). Representationalism and the Metonymic Fallacy. Synthese 118 (1):13-30.
David J. Chalmers (2010). The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (9-10):9 - 10.
la Mettrie & Julien Offray (1996). Machine Man and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,895 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,288 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?