Because it works. That's why!
| Abstract | Richard Feynman once remarked that unless one is able to make one's ideas understandable to college freshmen, one doesn't really understand them. On the other hand, when asked by a reporter to explain why he was awarded the Nobel Prize, Feynman remarked, "Listen buddy, if I could explain it in fifty words or less, it wouldn't be worth a Nobel Prize.". | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesLaurence Foss (1998). The Biomedical Paradigm and the Nobel Prize: Is It Time for a Change? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (6).
Rino Rumiati & Nicolao Bonini (2002). Daniel Kahneman: The Nobel Prize for Economics Awarded for Decision-Making Psychology. Mind and Society 3 (1):VII-XI.
Hub Zwart (2010). The Nobel Prize as a Reward Mechanism in the Genomics Era: Anonymous Researchers, Visible Managers and the Ethics of Excellence. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (3):299-312.
Franz Luttenberger (1992). Arrhenius Vs. Ehrlich on Immunochemistry: Decisions About Scientific Progress in the Context of the Nobel Prize. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (2).
Frank Portugal (2010). Oswald T. Avery: Nobel Laureate or Noble Luminary? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #122,917 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
