Darwin's predictable defenders: A response to Massimo Pigliucci by William A. Dembski
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Some Darwinists keep their Darwinism close to the vest. Others wear it on their sleeves. Massimo Pigliucci has it tattooed on his forehead. Indeed, his "Darwin Day" celebrations at the University of Tennessee have become an annual orgy of self-congratulation before Darwin's idol.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Massimo Pigliucci (2008). The Old and the New. Philosophy Now 70:38.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). A Misguided Attack on Evolution. [REVIEW] Nature 464:353-354.
Dan D. Crawford (2005). Review of William Dembski (Ed.), Michael Ruse (Ed.), Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (3).
Kevin Davey (2006). Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA - Edited by William A. Dembski and Michael Ruse. Philosophical Books 47 (4):383-386.
William A. Dembski (2002). No Free Lunch Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased Without Intelligence.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). What Darwin Got Wrong. [REVIEW] Philosophy Now 81:38-39.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #202,612 of 1,911,321 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #455,910 of 1,911,321 )
How can I increase my downloads?