Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Many scholars have pointed out obstacles to establishing a causal link between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and financial performance. Good Management Theory suggests CSR is necessary to maximizing financials. Others believe that, realistically, less ethical means are necessary. In response, this article proposes the Equivalency Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Returns (ETRR). It holds that, while CSR contributes to financials when managed adaptively and intelligently, unfortunately, corporate social irresponsibility produces equally strong financials when it is managed adaptively and intelligently. ETRR implies greater personal moral freedom and therefore responsibility for executives|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter deMaCarty (2009). Financial Returns of Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Moral Freedom and Responsibility of Business Leaders. Business and Society Review 114 (3):393-433.
Michael L. Barnett (2005). Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:287-292.
Junwei Shi, Haiyan Fu & Lijun Hu (2007). Social Responsibility, Social Capital, and Corporate Competitive Advantage in Transitional China. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:377-394.
Ivar Kolstad (2007). Why Firms Should Not Always Maximize Profits. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (2):137 - 145.
Smolens & Nicolaas Tempelhof (2005). Cultural Perspectives of CSR Opportunities for German Firms in Poland. International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:259-283.
Minna Halme & Juha Laurila (2009). Philanthropy, Integration or Innovation? Exploring the Financial and Societal Outcomes of Different Types of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3):325 - 339.
Rama B. Rao (2007). Good Corporate Governance Initiative to Ensure Corporate Social Responsibility. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:395-414.
Christian Fieseler (2011). On the Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions of Equity Analysts. Business Ethics 20 (2):131-147.
Philipp Schreck (2011). Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):167-188.
Hoje Jo & Maretno A. Harjoto (2012). The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1):53-72.
Yongtao Hong & Margaret L. Andersen (2011). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: An Exploratory Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4):461-471.
Rafael Bravo, Jorge Matute & José M. Pina (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Vehicle to Reveal the Corporate Identity: A Study Focused on the Websites of Spanish Financial Entities. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):129-146.
Gerard I. J. M. Zwetsloot (2003). From Management Systems to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):201 - 207.
Maria-Gaia Soana (2011). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance in the Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (1):133-148.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads1 ( #292,878 of 740,795 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,795 )
How can I increase my downloads?