Ethnomethodological Indifference: Just a Passing Phase?

Human Studies 40 (3):331-364 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines whether social workers and other direct service practitioners can find utility in ethnomethodology despite or even because of the policy of “indifference”. Garfinkel, the father of ethnomethodology, sets out “ethnomethodological indifference” to insist that EM studies do not supplement, formulate remedies, develop humanistic arguments, or encourage discussions of theory. While at first blush such limits on EM might appear to be a barrier for most social workers this paper argues against first impressions. It is argued that EM provides an important redirection for social work practice and research. Additionally, it is proposed that by approaching EM through Dorothy Smith’s Institutional Ethnography social workers can bridge Garfinkel’s quest for haeccities with extended social relations and actual courses of actions to find congruence between EM and accomplished professional practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethnomethodology and the institutional context.Tony Hak - 1995 - Human Studies 18 (2-3):109 - 137.
Skepticist philosophy as ethnomethodology.Alex Dennis - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (2):151-173.
How can ethnomethodology be Heideggerian?Alec McHoul - 1998 - Human Studies 21 (1):13-26.
Ethnomethodology and the position of relativist discourse.A. W. Mchoul - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (2):107–124.
For an Ethnomethodology of Healthcare Ethics.Nathan Emmerich - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (4):372-389.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-07

Downloads
25 (#614,662)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?