Financial returns of corporate social responsibility, and the moral freedom and responsibility of business leaders
| Abstract | A number of theorists have proposed mechanisms suggesting that corporate social responsibility produces better financial results. Others subscribe to the theory that, realistically, less ethical means are necessary. This article contains an analysis of these perspectives drawing on observations from evolutionary game theory and nature. Based on these analyzes, it is concluded that the financial returns of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility (CSR and CSI) are equal on average. The explanation is that CSR and CSI are driven to a state of equilibrium, because if one or the other were to offer higher profits, it would attract more players who would compete for the best opportunities until there was no difference in average profit. Existing empirical research generally shows a positive correlation between CSR as measured and financial outcomes. It is argued that what is actually causing that finding is probably not CSR but management skill. More skillful managers, whether actually responsible or irresponsible, are able to obtain both higher profits and greater credit in imperfect measures of CSR. Next it is shown that this theory of equal returns implies greater moral freedom and therefore responsibility for business leaders. It is concluded that this insight can intensify the interest of decent business leaders in vigorously championing CSR. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesLaura P. Hartman, Robert S. Rubin & K. Kathy Dhanda (2007). The Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: United States and European Union Multinational Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):373 - 389.
Rafael Bravo, Jorge Matute & José M. Pina (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Vehicle to Reveal the Corporate Identity: A Study Focused on the Websites of Spanish Financial Entities. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):129-146.
Smolens & Nicolaas Tempelhof (2005). Cultural Perspectives of CSR Opportunities for German Firms in Poland. International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:259-283.
Philipp Schreck (2011). Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):167-188.
Yongtao Hong & Margaret L. Andersen (2011). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4):461-471.
Stefan Tengblad & Claes Ohlsson (2010). The Framing of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Globalization of National Business Systems: A Longitudinal Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (4).
Christian Fieseler (2011). On the Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions of Equity Analysts. Business Ethics 20 (2):131-147.
Ivar Kolstad (2007). Why Firms Should Not Always Maximize Profits. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (2):137 - 145.
Gerard I. J. M. Zwetsloot (2003). From Management Systems to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):201 - 207.
Junwei Shi, Haiyan Fu & Lijun Hu (2007). Social Responsibility, Social Capital, and Corporate Competitive Advantage in Transitional China. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:377-394.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads17 ( #71,024 of 549,037 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,037 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
