David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
University of Chicago Press (1982)
In this study of the cognitive paradigm, De Mey applies the study of computer models of human perception to the philosophy and sociology of science. "A most stimulating, and intellectually delightful book."--John Goldsmith "[De Mey] has brought together an unusually wide range of material, and suggested some interesting lines of thought, about what should be an important application of cognitive science: The understanding of science itself."-- Cognition and Brain Theory "It ought to be on the shelf of every teacher and researcher in the field and on the reading list of any student or practitioner seriously interested in how those they serve are likely to set about knowing."-- ISIS.
|Keywords||Science Philosophy Science Methodology Cognition Cognitive science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$4.39 used (85% off) $5.71 new (80% off) $27.50 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.M5447 1992|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Steve Fuller (1987). Towards Objectivism and Relativism. Social Epistemology 1 (4):351 – 361.
Richard Kitchener (1989). Genetic Epistemology and the Prospects for a Cognitive Sociology of Science: A Critical Synthesis. Social Epistemology 3 (2):153 – 169.
Patrick Heelan (1987). The Primacy of Perception and the Cognitive Paradigm : Reply to de Mey. Social Epistemology 1 (4):321 – 326.
Roger Krohn (1991). Why Are Graphs so Central in Science? Biology and Philosophy 6 (2):181-203.
Klaus Fischer (1992). The Social and Cognitive Dynamics of Paradigmatic Change: A Scientometric Approach. Science in Context 5 (1).
Similar books and articles
William Bechtel (2009). Constructing a Philosophy of Science of Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (3):548-569.
Andy Clark (1991). Microcognition: Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
William Bechtel (2010). How Can Philosophy Be a True Cognitive Science Discipline? Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):357-366.
Hanne Andersen (2006). The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge University Press.
W. H. Dittrich (1994). Cognition for Science? Book Review of Giere on Scientific Cognition. [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)].
Richard Samuels (2002). Nativism in Cognitive Science. Mind and Language 17 (3):233-65.
William Herfel (2000). Marc de Mey, the Cognitive Paradigm: An Integrated Understanding of Scientific Development, Reprint, with a New Introduction. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 10 (1):165-168.
Ronald Giere (2002). 15 Scientific Cognition as Distributed Cognition. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen P. Stich & Michael Siegal (eds.), The Cognitive Basis of Science. Cambridge University Press. 285.
Linda B. Smith & Adam Sheya (2010). Is Cognition Enough to Explain Cognitive Development? Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):725-735.
Daniel Nazer, Aaron Ruby, Shaun Nichols, Jonathan Weinberg, Stephen Stich, Luc Faucher & Ron Mallon (2002). The Baby in the Lab-Coat: Why Child Development is Not an Adequate Model for Understanding the Development of Science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich & M. Siegal (eds.), The Cognitive Basis of Science. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #126,305 of 1,413,388 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,345 of 1,413,388 )
How can I increase my downloads?