Who controls the editorial content at corporate news organizations? An empirical test of the managerial revolution hypothesis
Graduate studies at Western
World Futures 57 (5):395-415 (2001)
|Abstract||Corporate news organizations are often accused of placing more emphasis on profits than on information diversity and other non?profit goals considered crucial for creating or maintaining a political democracy. These charges contradict the managerial revolution hypothesis, which expects that as power shifts from the owners to the professional managers and technocrats, a corporate organization should place less emphasis on profits and more emphasis on non?profit goals. This study reviews the literature on the managerial revolution hypothesis and empirically tests hypotheses related to the control question. The data generally support the managerial revolution thesis: newspaper owners (proprietors and stockholders) and publishers have less control over editorial content the more ?corporatized? the newspaper. This shift in power, if true, has major implications for theories of democracy and information diversity|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Muel Kaptein & Jan Van Dalen (2000). The Empirical Assessment of Corporate Ethics: A Case Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 24 (2):95 - 114.
I. I. I. John (2008). Not Biting the Hand That Feeds Them: Hegemonic Expediency in the Newsroom and the Karen Ryan/Health and Human Services Department Video News Release. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (2):110 – 125.
Betty S. Coffey & Jia Wang (1998). Board Diversity and Managerial Control as Predictors of Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (14):1595-1603.
Jeffrey L. Bradford & Dennis E. Garrett (1995). The Effectiveness of Corporate Communicative Responses to Accusations of Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (11):875 - 892.
John R. Danley (1988). “Ought” Implies “Can”, or, the Moral Relevance of a Theory of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):23 - 28.
Bastiaan Vanacker & Genelle Belmas (2009). Trust and the Economics of News. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (2 & 3):110 – 126.
Nabil A. Ibrahim, Donald P. Howard & John P. Angelidis (2003). Board Members in the Service Industry: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation and Directorial Type. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 47 (4):393 - 401.
K. Gregory Jin, Ron Drozdenko & Rick Bassett (2007). Information Technology Professionals' Perceived Organizational Values and Managerial Ethics: An Empirical Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 71 (2):149 - 159.
Margaret Anne Cleek & Sherry Lynn Leonard (1998). Can Corporate Codes of Ethics Influence Behavior? Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6):619 - 630.
Greg E. Loviscky, Linda K. Treviño & Rick R. Jacobs (2007). Assessing Managers' Ethical Decision-Making: An Objective Measure of Managerial Moral Judgment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 73 (3):263 - 285.
Rick Molz (1995). The Theory of Pluralism in Corporate Governance: A Conceputal Framework and Empirical Test. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (10):789 - 804.
Jaepil Choi & Heli Wang (2007). The Promise of a Managerial Values Approach to Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):345 - 359.
Ailian Gan (2006). The Impact of Public Scrutiny on Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (3):217 - 236.
Adam Lindgreen, Valérie Swaen & Wesley J. Johnston (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Organizations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):303 - 323.
Arthur Miller (1998). Survival and Diminished Consciousness. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:479-496.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-01
Total downloads1 ( #292,878 of 740,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?