David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy 105 (7):333 - 345 (2008)
Descartes’s proof of the existence of God in the third ’Meditation’ can be interpreted as a version of the argument from design. He cannot point to the marvels of nature, since all he has after the second ’Meditation’ is his ideas, but his idea of God serves as the brilliantly designed entity that he claims he cannot have authored on his own. Several passages in his replies to commentators support this interpretation, and when one considers what Descartes believed he had deduced from this idea, it is understandable that he could consider it a wonderful idea
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
R. J. Butler (1972). Cartesian Studies. Oxford,B. Blackwell.
Daniel C. Dennett (2007). Atheism and Evolution. In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 135--148.
Peter Slezak (2010). Doubts About Descartes' Indubitability: The Cogito as Intuition and Inference. Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Douglas C. Long (1969). Descartes' Argument for Mind-Body Dualism. Philosophical Forum 1 (3):259-273.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2008). Descartes's Substance Dualism and His Independence Conception of Substance. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):69-89.
Peter Slezak (2010). Doubts About Indubitability. Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Xiaoqiang Han (2009). Interpreting the Butterfly Dream. Asian Philosophy 19 (1):1 – 9.
Tom Vinci (2011). Argument and Persuasion in Descartes' Meditations. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):497-498.
Leon Pompa (1984). The Incoherence of the Cartesian Cogito. Inquiry 27 (1-4):3 – 21.
Dale Jacquette (1996). Descartes' Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads169 ( #22,078 of 1,911,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #81,598 of 1,911,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?