David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection unifies the world of physics with the world of meaning and purpose by proposing a deeply counterintuitive ‘‘inversion of reasoning’’ (according to a 19th century critic): ‘‘to make a perfect and beautiful machine, it is not requisite to know how to make it’’ [MacKenzie RB (1868) (Nisbet & Co., London)]. Turing proposed a similar inversion: to be a perfect and beautiful computing machine, it is not requisite to know what arithmetic is. Together, these ideas help to explain how we human intelligences came to be able to discern the reasons for all of the adaptations of life, including our own.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David Haig (2013). Proximate and Ultimate Causes: How Come? And What For? [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 28 (5):781-786.
Similar books and articles
Alan C. Love (2002). Darwin and "Cirripedia" Prior to 1846: Exploring the Origins of the Barnacle Research. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 35 (2):251 - 289.
Phillip Prodger (2009). Darwin's Camera: Art and Photography in the Theory of Evolution. Oxford University Press.
Myron Glassman & R. Bruce Mcafee (2005). Pay Inversion at Universities: Is It Ethical? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 56 (4):325 - 333.
James G. Lennox (1993). Darwin Was a Teleologist. Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):409-421.
Neil Campbell (2004). Generalizing Qualia Inversion. Erkenntnis 60 (1):27-34.
Peter Schroeder-Heister (2007). Generalized Definitional Reflection and the Inversion Principle. Logica Universalis 1 (2):355-376.
Clayton Littlejohn (2009). On the Coherence of Inversion. Acta Analytica 24 (2):127-137.
Jeff Speaks (2011). Spectrum Inversion Without a Difference in Representation is Impossible. Philosophical Studies 156 (3):339-361.
Added to index2009-06-23
Total downloads48 ( #53,895 of 1,699,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,699,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?