David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology 1 (1):7-19 (2003)
Is the view supported that consciousness is a mysterious phenomenon and cannot succumb, even with much effort, to the standard methods of cognitive science? The lecture, using the analogy of the magicians praxis, attempts to highlight a strong but little supported intuition that is one of the strongest supporters of this view. The analogy can be highly illuminating, as the following account by LEE SIEGEL on the reception of her work on magic can illustrate it: Im writing a book on magic, I explain, and Im asked, Real magic? By real magic people mean miracles, thaumaturgical acts, and supernatural powers. No, I answer: Conjuring tricks, not real magic. Real magic, in other words, refers to the magic that is not real, while the magic that is real, that can actually be done, is not real magic. I suggest that many, e.g., DAVID CHALMERS has (unintentionally) perpetrated the same feat of conceptual sleight-of-hand in declaring to the world that he has discovered The Hard Problem of consciousness. It is, however, possible that what appears to be the Hard Problem is simply the large bag of tricks that constitute what CHALMERS calls the Easy Problems of Consciousness. These all have mundane explanations, requiring no revolutions in physics, no emergent novelties. I cannot prove that there is no Hard Problem, and CHALMERS cannot prove that there is. He can appeal to your intuitions, but this is not a sound basis on which to found a science of consciousness. The magic (i.e., the supposed unexplainability) of consciousness, like stage magic, defies explanation only so long as we take it at face value. Once we appreciate all the non-mysterious (i.e., explainable) ways in which the brain can create benign userillusions, we can begin to imagine how the brain creates consciousness
|Keywords||*Consciousness States *Intuition *Mysticism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Piotr Boltuc (2009). The Philosophical Issue in Machine Consciousness. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 1 (01):155-176.
David John Chalmers (2010). The Character of Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Wendy Elgersma Helleman (2011). Plotinus and Magic. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):114-146.
Daniel O'Shiel (2012). Sartre's Magical Being: An Introduction by Way of an Example. Sartre Studies International 17 (2):28-41.
Larry A. Hickman (2000). What Was Dewey's “Magic Number?”. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:221-231.
Marj Jibu & Kunio Yasue (1997). Magic Without Magic: Meaning of Quantum Brain Dynamics. Journal of Mind and Behavior.
Nicholas Humphrey (2011). Soul Dust: The Magic of Consciousness. Princeton University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads310 ( #1,110 of 1,099,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #10,918 of 1,099,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?