Fine's Mctaggart, temporal passage, and the a versus b‐debate

Ratio 26 (1):19-34 (2013)
Abstract
I offer an interpretation and a partial defense of Kit Fine's ‘Argument from Passage’, which is situated within his reconstruction of McTaggart's paradox. Fine argues that existing A-theoretic approaches to passage are no more dynamic, i.e. capture passage no better, than the B-theory. I argue that this comparative claim is correct. Our intuitive picture of passage, which inclines us towards A-theories, suggests more than coherent A-theories can deliver. In Finean terms, the picture requires not only Realism about tensed facts, but also Neutrality, i.e. the tensed facts not being ‘oriented towards’ one privileged time. However unlike Fine, and unlike others who advance McTaggartian arguments, I take McTaggart's paradox to indicate neither the need for a more dynamic theory of passage nor that time does not pass. A more dynamic theory is not to be had: Fine's ‘non-standard realism’ amounts to no more than a conceptual gesture. But instead of concluding that time does not pass, we should conclude that theories of passage cannot deliver the dynamicity of our intuitive picture. For this reason, a B-theoretic account of passage that simply identifies passage with the succession of times is a serious contender
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Natalja Deng, Fine's Mctaggart, temporal passage, and the a versus b‐debate
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Gilbert Plumer (1987). Expressions of Passage. Philosophical Quarterly 37 (149):341-354.
Ned Markosian (1993). How Fast Does Time Pass? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):829-844.
Bradford Skow (2011). Experience and the Passage of Time. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):359-387.
Fabrice Correia & Sven Rosenkranz (2012). Eternal Facts in an Ageing Universe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):307 - 320.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-02-17

Total downloads

153 ( #5,043 of 1,102,846 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

23 ( #6,885 of 1,102,846 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.