|Abstract||The background to this paper is as follows. In 1998 Glen Whitman published a paper in Constitutional Political Economy called ‘Hayek contra Pangloss on Evolutionary Systems’. At the same time and unaware of Whitman’s work, I posted my draft PhD chapter ‘Friedrich Hayek: a Panglossian evolutionary theorist’ (Denis, 2001, contains the final version) on my web page. Alain Albert (personal communication), having read the PhD chapter, drew my attention to Whitman’s article, and the result was a paper ‘Was Hayek a Panglossian Evolutionary Theorist? A Reply to Whitman’ in the same journal in 2002. This in turn led to Whitman’s ‘Hayek Contra Pangloss: A Rejoinder’, also in Constitutional Political Economy, in December 2003. Now read on ….|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Ryszard Legutko (1997). Was Hayek an Instrumentalist? Critical Review 11 (1):145-164.
Donald W. Livingston (1991). Hayek as Humean. Critical Review 5 (2):159-177.
Leslie Marsh (2010). Hayek: Cognitive Scientist Avant La Lettre. In William Butos, Roger Koppl & Steve Horwitz (eds.), Advances in Austrian Economics. Emerald.
Andy Denis (2006). Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek. [REVIEW] Review of Political Economy 18 (4):579-583.
E. Angner (2002). The History of Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):695-718.
Roland Kley (1994). Hayek's Social and Political Thought. Oxford University Press.
Andy Denis (2002). Was Hayek a Panglossian Evolutionary Theorist? A Reply to Whitman. Constitutional Political Economy 13 (3):275-285.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #124,487 of 556,747 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,754 of 556,747 )
How can I increase my downloads?