David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Philosophical Quarterly. 161-74 (2006)
David Lewis' objection to a generic theory of modality which he calls ‘magical ersatzism’ is that its linchpin, a relation he calls ‘selection’, must be either an internal or an external relation, and that this is unintelligible either way. But the problem he points out with classifying selection as internal is really just an instance of the general problem of how we manage to grasp underdetermined predicates, is not peculiar to magical ersatzism, and is amenable to some familiar solutions. He provides no compelling grounds for thinking that classifying selection as external is unintelligible, and his argument has a false presupposition. I conclude that magical ersatzism is still a viable option in the metaphysics of modality
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Van Inwagen (1980). Indexicality and Actuality. Philosophical Review 89 (3):403 - 426.
David Lewis (1986). Against Structural Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):25 – 46.
David Lewis (1984). Putnam's Paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):221 – 236.
Robert C. Stalnaker (1976). Possible Worlds. Noûs 10 (1):65-75.
Citations of this work BETA
Katherine Hawley (2010). Mereology, Modality and Magic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):117 – 133.
Similar books and articles
Tony Roy (1995). In Defense of Linguistic Ersatzism. Philosophical Studies 80 (3):217 - 242.
By Kevin Zaragoza (2007). Bring Back the Magic. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):391–402.
Michael Hymers (1991). Something Less Than Paradise: The Magic of Modal Realism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (3):251 – 263.
D. C. Smith (2003). What is so Magical About a Theory of Intrinsic Intentionality? Philosophical Papers 32 (1):83-96.
Bruce L. Bachelder (2001). The Magical Number 4 = 7: Span Theory on Capacity Limitations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):116-117.
Ulrich Meyer (2009). Times in Tense Logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2):201--19.
A. D. Nock (1926). A New Magical Papyrus Papyri Osloenses. Fasc. I: Magical Papyri Edited by S. Eitrem. Pp. 151, with Thirteen Plates. Published by Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi I Oslo. Oslo, on Commission by Jacob Dybwad, 1925. 20 Kroner. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (01):26-27.
H. J. Rose (1951). Magical Amulets Campbell Bonner: Studies in Magical Amulets, Chiefly Graeco-Egyptian. Pp. Xxiv + 334; 25 Plates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press (London: Oxford University Press), 1950. Cloth, £5 Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 1 (3-4):213-214.
By David A. Denby (2006). In Defence of Magical Ersatzism. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):161–174.
Added to index2009-02-05
Total downloads89 ( #16,773 of 1,413,334 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #41,846 of 1,413,334 )
How can I increase my downloads?