Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):810-11 (1995)
|Abstract||We have learned that the issues we raised are very difficult to think about clearly, and what "works" for one thinker falls flat for another, and leads yet another astray. So it is particularly useful to get these re-expressions of points we have tried to make. Both commentaries help by proposing further details for the Multiple Drafts Model, and asking good questions. They either directly clarify, or force us to clarify, our own account. They also both demonstrate how hard it is for even sympathetic commentators always to avoid the very habits of thought the Multiple Drafts Model was designed to combat. While acknowledging and expanding on their positive contributions, we must sound a few relatively minor alarms.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David M. Rosenthal (1993). Review: Multiple Drafts and Higher-Order Thoughts. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):911 - 918.
Russell Hardin (1980). Book Review:Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Douglas R. Hofstadter. [REVIEW] Ethics 90 (2):310-.
Kathleen Akins (1996). Lost the Plot? Reconstructing Dennett's Multiple Drafts Theory of Consciousness. Mind and Language 11 (1):1-43.
S. J. Todd (2006). Unmasking Multiple Drafts. Philosophical Psychology 19 (4):477-494.
David M. Rosenthal (1995). Multiple Drafts and the Facts of the Matter. In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Conscious Experience. Ferdinand Schoningh.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #36,918 of 722,704 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,864 of 722,704 )
How can I increase my downloads?