David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kluwer Law International (2002)
The law persists because people have reasons to comply with its rules. What characterizes those reasons is their interdependence: each of us only has a reason to comply because he or she expects the others to comply for the same reasons. The rules may help us to solve coordination problems, but the interaction patterns regulated by them also include Prisoner's Dilemma games, Division problems and Assurance problems. In these "games" the rules can only persist if people can be expected to be moved by considerations of fidelity and fairness, not only of prudence.This book takes a fresh look at the perennial problems of legal philosophy - the source of obligation to obey the law, the nature of authority, the relationship between law and morality, and the nature of legal argument - from the perspective of this conventionalist understanding of social rules. It argues that, since the resilience of such rules depends on cooperative dispositions, conventionalism, properly understood, does not imply positivism.
|Keywords||Law Philosophy Obedience (Law Legal positivism Law and ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$187.15 new (22% off) $187.96 used (22% off) $239.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||K230.H366.A36 2002|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Boudewijn de Bruin (2005). Game Theory in Philosophy. Topoi 24 (2):197-208.
Govert den Hartogh (2012). The Role of the Relatives in Opt-in Systems of Postmortal Organ Procurement. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):195-205.
Christian Dahlman (2011). When Conventionalism Goes Too Far. Ratio Juris 24 (3):335-346.
Bruno Verbeek (2008). Conventions and Moral Norms: The Legacy of Lewis. Topoi 27 (1-2):73-86.
Boudewijn De Bruin (2005). Game Theory in Philosophy. Topoi 24 (2):197-208.
Similar books and articles
Matthew H. Kramer (1999). In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings. Oxford University Press.
Leon Petrażycki (2010). Law and Morality. Translation Publishers.
Theodore M. Benditt (1978). Law as Rule and Principle: Problems of Legal Philosophy. Stanford University Press.
Robert P. George (ed.) (1996). The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Robert Alexy (2002). The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Roger A. Shiner (1992). Norm and Nature: The Movements of Legal Thought. Oxford University Press.
F. Atria (1999). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited. Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Stig Jørgensen (1978). Values in Law: Ideas, Principles and Rules. Juristforbundet.
Neil MacCormick (2007). Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #286,939 of 1,796,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,795 of 1,796,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?