|Abstract||(1) I am grateful for the information about von Schilcher and Tennant's book, which unaccountably had not crossed my path before. I am not the only author to have overlooked it, and a cursory reading shows that it does anticipate points in many more recent books, including my own. And Mulhauser is right that Sampson and Montague would have been valuable allies had I developed my critique of Chomsky further--but that is a tangential issue in an overlong book|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Dennett (1993). Caveat Emptor (Reply to Essays on Consciousness Explained - Reply to Mangan, Toribio, Baars and Mcgovern) In. Consciousness and Cognition 2 (1):48-57.
Luca Malatesti, Forum on Peter, Carruthers. Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Forum 2 SWIF Philosophy of Mind Review.
Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve (2011). Reply to Crisp. Utilitas 23:109-114.
Phillip Ferreira (2011). On the Imperviousness of Persons: A Reply to Jan Olof Bengtsson. The Pluralist 6 (1).
John Dupré (2005). You Must Have Thought This Book Was About You1: Reply to Daniel Dennett. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):691–695.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2011). Agents and Acacias: Replies to Dennett, Sterelny, and Queller. Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):501-515.
Sven-Ove Hansson & Hans Rott (1998). Beyond Recovery? A Reply to Tennant. Erkenntnis 49 (3):387-392.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #114,230 of 550,854 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,854 )
How can I increase my downloads?