Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||This note argues that the charge of reductionism levelled against Richard Dawkins is false. It does so by examining the development of his notion of the genes in his books The Selfish Gene (TSG), and The Extended Phenotype (TEP).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Mary Midgley (1979). Gene-Juggling. Philosophy 54 (210):439 - 458.
Richard Dawkins (1999). Gene Machines (1). The Philosopher's Magazine 6 (6):40-42.
Richard Dawkins (1999). Gene Machines (2). The Philosopher's Magazine 6 (6):45-45.
Anna Marek Bieniasz, Responsibility for Nature Versus Gene-Centred View on Evolution by Richard Dawkins.
Robert C. Richardson (1984). Book Review:The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection Richard Dawkins. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 51 (2):357-.
Nicholas Agar (1996). Teleogy and Genes. Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):289-300.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,909 of 739,427 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,427 )
How can I increase my downloads?