Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Daniel C. Dennett (1993). Review of F. Varela, E. Thompson and E. Rosch, The Embodied Mind. American Journal of Psychology 106:121-126.Cognitive science, as an interdisciplinary school of thought, may have recently moved beyond the bandwagon stage onto the throne of orthodoxy, but it does not make a favorable first impression on many people. Familiar reactions on first encounters range from revulsion to condescending dismissal--very few faces in the crowd light up with the sense of "Aha! So that's how the mind works! Of course!" Cognitive science leaves something out, it seems; moreover, what it apparently leaves out is important, even precious. Boiled down to its essence, cognitive science proclaims that in one way or another our minds are computers, and this seems so mechanistic, reductionistic, intellectualistic, dry, philistine, unbiological. It leaves out emotion, or what philosophers call qualia, or value, or mattering, or . . . the soul. It doesn't explain what minds are so much as attempt to explain minds away.Reading list | Discuss | Edit | Categorize |My bibliography
| Export citation | Other links: ase.tufts.edu cogprints.org citebase.eprints.org | Scholar | At my library 
Discussion of Daniel C. Dennett, Review of F. Varela, E. Thompson and E. Rosch, _The Embodied Mind_
 Back
All discussions
Start a new thread
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.
Similar books and articles
To what degree must the brains and bodies of creatures with minds have to be similar to the brains and bodies of human beings? Since the late 1960’s, most philosophers and cognitive scientists have supposed that there a relatively few constraints on what sorts of brains and bodies can realize minds. It is widely believed that minds are multiply realizable. Of course there were always dissenters, and in recent years their grumbling has grown harder to dismiss. In _The Mind_ _Incarnate_, (...)
Reading list
| Discuss | Edit | Categorize | My bibliography | Export citation | Other links: homepages.uc.edu | Scholar | Share & More ...
| | Other links: homepages.uc.edu | Scholar | Share & More ... Two books published within months of each other, each critical of the reigning family of working assumptions known as cognitive science, each calling for a more biological vision of the mind and even sharing a slogan: we must see the mind as "embodied". Is this merely a striking coincidence or perhaps a case of convergent evolution of scientific ideas? There are further striking similarities. Francisco Varela, the principle author of The Embodied Mind, is an immunologist-turned-neuroscientist, and so is Gerald Edelman, (...)
No categories
Reading list
| Discuss | Edit | Categorize | My bibliography | Export citation | Other links: cogprints.org | Scholar | Share & More ...
| | Other links: cogprints.org | Scholar | Share & More ... The Embodied Mind provides a unique, sophisticated treatment of the spontaneous and reflective dimension of human experience.
Reading list
| Discuss | Edit | Categorize | My bibliography | Export citation | Other links: cogweb.ucla.edu sscnet.ucla.edu buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ...
| | Other links: cogweb.ucla.edu sscnet.ucla.edu buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ... Cognitive science, as an interdisciplinary school of thought, may have recently moved beyond the bandwagon stage onto the throne of orthodoxy, but it does not make a favorable first impression on many people. Familiar reactions on first encounters range from revulsion to condescending dismissal--very few faces in the crowd light up with the sense of "Aha! So that's how the mind works! Of course!" Cognitive science leaves something out, it seems; moreover, what it apparently leaves out is important, even precious. (...)
Reading list
| Discuss | Edit | Categorize | My bibliography | Export citation | Other links: cogprints.org | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ...
| | Other links: cogprints.org | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ... Cognitive science, as an interdisciplinary school of thought, may have recently moved beyond the bandwagon stage onto the throne of orthodoxy, but it does not make a favorable first impression on many people. Familiar reactions on first encounters range from revulsion to condescending dismissal--very few faces in the crowd light up with the sense of "Aha! So that's how the mind works! Of course!" Cognitive science leaves something out , it seems; moreover, what it apparently leaves out is important, even (...)
Reading list
| Discuss | Edit | Categorize | My bibliography | Export citation | Scholar | Share & More ...
| | Scholar | Share & More ... This talk, delivered at De l''autopoièse à la neurophénoménologie: un hommage à Francisco Varela; from autopoiesis to neurophenomenology: a tribute to Francisco Varela, June 18–20, at the Sorbonne in Paris, explicates several links between Varela''s neurophenomenology and his biological concept of autopoiesis.
Reading list
| Discuss | Edit | Categorize | My bibliography | Export citation | Other links: springerlink.com kluweronline.com | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ...
| | Other links: springerlink.com kluweronline.com | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ... Embodied cognition (EC) is growing up, and How the Body Shapes the Mind is both a sign of, and substantive contributor to, this ongoing development. Born in or about 1991 (the year of publication of seminal works by Brooks, Dreyfus, and Varela, Thompson & Rosch), EC is only now emerging from a tumultuous but exciting childhood marked in particular by the size and breadth of the extended family hoping to have some impact on its early education and upbringing. As family (...)
Reading list
| Discuss | Edit | Categorize | My bibliography | Export citation | Scholar | Share & More ...
| | Scholar | Share & More ... 
