|Abstract||When Professor Orr published his hostile review of Darwin's Dangerous Idea in the biology journal, Evolution, last February, I was not pleased. His review was full of falsehoods and misconstruals, but I had no recourse; that journal, like most academic journals, does not permit authors to respond to reviews. Luckily for me, Orr has been so eager to warn the world of my errors that he has restated his attack, with embellishments, in the Boston Review, which has invited me to respond. Months have passed, the damage has been done, but at least I get to set the record straight|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Leonard Orr (1980). The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts (Review). Philosophy and Literature 4 (1):138-139.
Orr, Leonard & Ed (1995). Book Review: Critical Essays on Samuel Taylor Coleridge. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (1).
D. R. Rokyta, P. Joyce, S. B. Caudle & H. A. Wichman (2005). An Empirical Test of the Mutational Landscape Model of Adaptation Using a Single-Stranded DNA Virus. Nature Genetics 37 (4):441-444.
Sandra Menssen (1993). Do Women and Men Use Different Logics? A Reply to Carol Gilligan and Deborah Orr. Informal Logic 15 (2):123-138.
Madhu Suri Prakash (1995). Ecological Literacy for Moral Virtue: Orr on [Moral] Education for Postmodern Sustainability. Journal of Moral Education 24 (1):3-18.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #85,901 of 722,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,701 )
How can I increase my downloads?