David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:125-136 (2002)
Central to Kierkegaard’s account of religious existence is his critique of speculative reason. This critique begins with the distinction between subjective and objective reflection. Its most radical aspects appear in Kierkegaard’s discussions of the paradox. In spite of Kierkegaard’s frequent comments on this notion, it is not readily understood. I want to argue against a common reading of this notion and propose an alternative reading. This alternative reading allows for a conceptually quite plausible account of the manner in which the paradox presents reason with a boundary, in virtue of its relation to objective reflection and to subjective reflection as well. Because of this boundary, reason points beyond its own achievements to a domain of contemplation and appropriation. This is a domain that reason itself identifies in connection with the paradox. It both surpasses rational achievements and integrates them into itself
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matthew T. Nowachek (2012). On the Non-Bracketing of Fairy Tale in Paradox Discourse. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):5-20.
Patrick L. Bourgeois (2002). Philosophy at the Boundary of Reason. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:1-21.
Patrick L. Bourgeois (2006). Marcel and Ricoeur: Mystery and Hope at the Boundary of Reason in the Postmodern Situation. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):421-433.
Howard Alexander Slaatte (1968). The Pertinence of the Paradox: The Dialectics of Reason-in-Existence. New York, Humanities Press.
Richard Schmitt (1965). The Paradox in Kierkegaard's Religiousness A. Inquiry 8 (1-4):118 – 135.
Karen L. Carr (1996). The Offense of Reason and the Passion of Faith. Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):236-251.
C. S. Evans (1989). Is Kierkegaard an Irrationalist? Reason, Paradox, and Faith. Religious Studies 25 (3):347 - 362.
Jason Stanley (2003). Context, Interest Relativity and the Sorites. Analysis 63 (4):269–281.
O. Bueno & M. Colyvan (2003). Yablo's Paradox and Referring to Infinite Objects. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):402 – 412.
Nathan Bauer (2010). Kant's Subjective Deduction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):433-460.
Herbert Schnädelbach (1998). Transformations of the Concept of Reason. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):3 - 14.
Herbert Schnadelbach (1998). Transformations of the Concept of Reason. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):3-14.
R. Stecker (2011). Should We Still Care About the Paradox of Fiction? British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):295-308.
Brian Davies (2009). Is God Beyond Reason? Philosophical Investigations 32 (4):338-359.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads1 ( #433,596 of 1,098,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?