David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):341-357 (2004)
To understand the work of economic theorists it is often helpful to situate it in the context of the rhetorical strategy they were pursuing. Two ontologically distinct rhetorical strategies of laissez-faire may be distinguished by the way they articulate the individual interest with the general interest. A reductionist approach, exemplified by Friedman and Lucas, suggests that the properties and behaviour of an entity can be understood in terms of the properties and behaviour of the constituent lower-level components, taken in isolation. The contrary – holistic – stance, viewing the qualities of phenomena as products of the inter-relations between their component parts, is characteristic of Smith and Hayek. While the reductionist approach naturally issues in a laissez- faire policy prescription, the holistic account is more problematic. Reconciling a holistic ontology with a reductionist policy prescription requires the intercalation of a black box, such as an evolutionary process or the invisible hand of a deity.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tyler Cowen (1989). Why Keynesianism Triumphed or, Could so Many Keynesians Have Been Wrong? Critical Review 3 (3-4):518-530.
Jeffrey Friedman (1992). After Libertarianism: Rejoinder to Narveson, McCloskey, Flew, and Machan. Critical Review 6 (1):113-152.
Waheed Hussain (2006). Democratic Capitalism and Respect for the Value of Freedom. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):280-293.
Kevin Dowd (2000). Are Free Markets the Cause of Financial Instability? Critical Review 14 (1):57-67.
Garett Jones (2000). “The Free Market” and the Asian Crisis. Critical Review 14 (1):47-56.
Andy Denis (2002). Was Hayek a Panglossian Evolutionary Theorist? A Reply to Whitman. Constitutional Political Economy 13 (3):275-285.
Barry Eichengreen (2000). The Crisis of (Confidence in) Global Capitalism. Critical Review 14 (1):69-85.
Daniel B. Klein (1992). Go Ahead and Let Him Try: A Plea for Egonomic Laissez-Faire. Inquiry 35 (1):3 – 20.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #180,595 of 1,679,298 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #48,280 of 1,679,298 )
How can I increase my downloads?