David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
One critic complained that my argument was ‘philosophical’, as though that was sufficient condemnation. Philosophical or not, the fact is that neither he nor anybody else has found any flaw in what I said. And ‘in principle’ arguments such as mine, far from being irrelevant to the real world, can be more powerful than arguments based on particular factual research. My reasoning, if it is correct, tells us something important about life everywhere in the universe. Laboratory and field research can tell us only about life as we have sampled it here. (The Selfish Gene (second edn, p322 in endnotes)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary Midgley (1983). Selfish Genes and Social Darwinism. Philosophy 58 (225):365.
Christopher G. Framarin (2008). Unselfishness. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):69-83.
Colin Grant (1991). The Gregarious Metaphor of the Selfish Gene. Religious Studies 27 (4):431 - 450.
Karola Stotz & Paul Griffiths (2004). Genes: Philosophical Analyses Put to the Test. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26 (1):5-28.
W. J. Ewens (2011). What is the Gene Trying to Do? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):155-176.
James Miles (1998). Unnatural Selection. Philosophy 73 (4):593-608.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads155 ( #23,298 of 1,796,321 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #206,830 of 1,796,321 )
How can I increase my downloads?