Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Phenemenological Research 59 (3):747-61 (1999)
Paul Churchland's book (hereafter ER)is an entertaining and instructive advertisement for a "neurocomputational" vision of how the brain (and mind) works. While we agree with its general thrust, and commend its lucid pedagogy on a host of difficult topics, we note that such pedagogy often exploits artificially heightened contrast, and sometimes the result is a misleading caricature instead of a helpful simplification. In particular, Churchland is eager to contrast the explanation of consciousness that can be accomplished by his "aspiring new structural and dynamic cognitive prototype: recurrent PDP networks" (p.266) with what strikes him as the retrograde introduction by Dennett of a virtual von Neumannesque machine--a "failed prototype"--as the key element in an explanation of human consciousness (in
_Consciousness__Explained_, 1991, hereafter, CE). We will try to show that by oversimplifying Dennett's alternative, he has taken a potential supplement to his own view--a much needed supplement--and transformed it in his imagination into a subversive threat. In part 1, we will expose and correct the mistaken contrasts. In part 2, we will compare the performance of the two views on Churchland's list of seven features of consciousness any theory must account for, showing that Dennett's account provides more than Churchland has recognized, and indeed offers answers to key questions that Churchland's account is powerless to address. At that point, Churchland's project and Dennett's could be seen to collaborate in a useful division of labor instead of being in mortal combat, were it not for what appears to be a fairly major disagreement about consciousness in non-human animals. Part 3 briefly examines this issue. It may be due to a misunderstanding, which when cleared up might restore the happy prospect of unification.
|Keywords||Epistemology Machine Virtual Virtue Churchland, P|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Aarre Laakso & Garrison W. Cottrell (2006). Churchland on Connectionism. In Brian L. Keeley (ed.), Paul Churchland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paul M. Churchland & Patricia S. Churchland (1990). Could a Machine Think? Scientific American 262 (1):32-37.
E. Sayan (1988). A Closer Look at the Chinese Nation Argument. Philosophy Research Archives 13:129-36.
Michael Beaton (2005). What RoboDennett Still Doesn't Know. Journal Of Consciousness Studies 12 (12):3-25.
John L. Pollock (2008). What Am I? Virtual Machines and the Mind/Body Problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):237–309.
Robert N. McCauley (1993). Brainwork: A Review of Paul Churchland's a Neurocomputational Perspective. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):81 – 96.
Brian L. Keeley (2006). Paul Churchland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daniel C. Dennett (2005). Two Steps Closer on Consciousness. In Brian L. Keeley (ed.), Paul Churchland. Cambridge University Press.
Paul M. Churchland (1999). Densmore and Dennett on Virtual Machines and Consciousness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):763-767.
Daniel Dennett & Shannon Densmore (1999). The Virtues of Virtual Machines. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):747 - 761.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #27,388 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,124 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?