David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Mikko Salmela & Verena Mayer (eds.), Emotions, Ethics, and Authenticity. John Benjamins 33-50 (2009)
The evaluations involved in shame are, intuitively at least, of many different sorts. One feels ashamed when seen by others doing something one would prefer doing alone (social shame). One is ashamed because of one’s ugly nose (shame about permanent traits). One feels ashamed of one’s dishonest behavior (moral shame), etc. The variety of evaluations in shame is striking; and it is even more so if one takes a cross-cultural perspective on this emotion. So the difficulty – the “unity problem” of shame- turns out to be the following: is there a common trait shared by all shame evaluations that will allow us to differentiate these evaluations from those that feature in other negative self-reflexive emotions like anger at oneself or self disappointment? Some progress is perhaps accomplished if we say that, in shame, a given trait or behavior is evaluated as degrading or as revealing one’s lack of worth. Still, even if we agree with this last claim, truth is that these answers are less illuminating than we might wish. A theory of shame should surely further elucidate the aspect of one’s identity relevant for shame, namely, the self of shame. In this connexion, philosophers have referred to “self-esteem,” “self-respect” or the “social self,” significantly disagreeing thus on which aspect of one’s identity is at stake in shame. After critically discussing the different solutions to the problem, we offer our own. Shame, we claim, consists in an awareness of a distinctive inability to discharge a commitment that goes with holding self-relevant values. This conception solves the unity problem while illuminating other aspects of this emotion.
|Keywords||shame self identity morality value|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fritz Hartmann (1984). The Corporeality of Shame: Px and Hx at the Bedside. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (1):63-74.
Fabrice Teroni & Julien A. Deonna (2011). Is Shame a Social Emotion? In Anita Konzelmann Ziv, Keith Lehrer & Hans Bernard Schmid (eds.), Self-Evaluation: Affective and Social Grounds of Intentionality. Springer 193-212.
Heidi Maibom (2010). The Descent of Shame. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3):566 - 594.
Julien A. Deonna & Fabrice Teroni (2008). Differentiating Shame From Guilt. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1063-1400..
Dan Zahavi (2010). Shame and the Exposed Self. In Jonathan Webber (ed.), Reading Sartre: On Phenomenology and Existentialism. Routledge
Jennifer C. Manion (2003). Girls Blush, Sometimes: Gender, Moral Agency, and the Problem of Shame. Hypatia 18 (3):21-41.
Agnes Heller (1985). The Power of Shame: A Rational Perspective. Routledge & K. Paul.
Jill Locke (2007). Shame and the Future of Feminism. Hypatia 22 (4):146-162.
Julien Deonna, Fabrice Teroni & Raffaele Rodogno (2011). In Defense of Shame. Oxford University Press.
Michael L. Morgan (2008). On Shame. Routledge.
Added to index2010-01-21
Total downloads107 ( #38,904 of 1,934,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #113,563 of 1,934,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?