Body-extension versus body-incorporation: Is there a need for a body-model? [Book Review]

Abstract
This paper investigates the role of a pre-existing body-model that is an enabling constraint for the incorporation of objects into the body. This body-model is also a basis for the distinction between body extensions (e.g., in the case of tool-use) and incorporation (e.g., in the case of successful prosthesis use). It is argued that, in the case of incorporation, changes in the sense of body-ownership involve a reorganization of the body-model, whereas extension of the body with tools does not involve changes in the sense of body-ownership.
Keywords Embodiment  Body-model  Sense of body-ownership  Incorporation  Prosthesis  Tool
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,948
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Andy Clark (1999). An Embodied Cognitive Science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (9):345-351.

View all 11 references

Citations of this work BETA
Gabrielle Benette Jackson (2014). Skillful Action in Peripersonal Space. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2):313-334.

View all 9 citations

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-03-04

Total downloads

83 ( #15,286 of 1,100,838 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #44,113 of 1,100,838 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.