Oxford University Press (2003)
|Abstract||The idea of a virtue has traditionally been important in ethics, but only recently has gained attention as an idea that can explain how we ought to form beliefs as well as how we ought to act. Moral philosophers and epistemologists have different approaches to the idea of intellectual virtue; here, Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski bring work from both fields together for the first time to address all of the important issues. It will be required reading for anyone working on either side of the debate.|
|Keywords||Virtue epistemology Virtue|
|Buy the book||$29.72 used (75% off) $96.07 new (17% off) $115.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BD176.I58 2003|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Heather Battaly (2008). Virtue Epistemology. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):639-663.
Jason S. Baehr (2006). Character in Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 128 (3):479--514.
Roger Crisp (2010). Virtue Ethics and Virtue Epistemology. Metaphilosophy 41 (1):22-40.
Guy Axtell (1997). Recent Work on Virtue Epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1):1 - 26.
Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski (1996). Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry Into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Abrol Fairweather & Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski (eds.) (2001). Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
Jennifer Lackey (2004). Review of Michael DePaul (Ed.), Linda Zagzebski (Ed.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives From Ethics and Epistemology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (8).
Jason Baehr (2006). Character, Reliability and Virtue Epistemology. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):193–212.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads73 ( #11,350 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,222 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?