Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (1):1-5 (1995)
|Abstract||In Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Richard Rorty courageously takes a stand against the public dissemination of ironist philosophical theory, such as that produced by Nietzsche, because he sees it as being socially undermining and irreconcilable in theoretical terms with liberal democratic values. And yet, the intellectuals in his ideal society would, privately, share many of the same views from which Rorty would desire that the general public be protected. Thus Rorty would appear to trade tensions between the individual and the state for tensions between the intellectual and the nonintellectual---a dubious improvement. By redescribing both the motives of the typical ironist theorist and his basic view of large-scale, sociopolitical structure I will try to reinstate the social value of ironist theory. Throughout the paper I will fomlulate perspectives and raise questions illustrative of such theory and aimed at trying to maintain as full and open a communication as possible between the individual, whether intellectual or not, and the sociopolitical structures within which he finds himself|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rudi Visker (1999). 'Hold the Being': How to Split Rorty Between Irony and Finitude. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2):27-45.
Dane Depp (1999). Reading Rorty's "Ironist Philosophers" as Post-Ironists. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 13 (2):79-97.
Duck-Joo Kwak (2004). Reconsideration of Rorty's View of the Liberal Ironist and its Implications for Postmodern Civic Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (4):347–359.
Susan Dieleman (2010). Revisiting Rorty: Contributions to a Pragmatist Feminism. Hypatia 25 (4):891-908.
Chad Kautzer (2003). Rorty's Country, Rorty's Empire. Radical Philosophy Review 6 (2):131-144.
Sandy Isaacs, Jenny Ploeg & Catherine Tompkins (2009). How Can Rorty Help Nursing Science in the Development of a Philosophical 'Foundation'? Nursing Philosophy 10 (2):81-90.
Nikolas Kompridis (2000). Reorienting Critique: From Ironist Theory to Transformative Practice. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):23-47.
Richard Rorty (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Rorty (2006). Take Care of Freedom and Truth Will Take Care of Itself: Interviews with Richard Rorty. Stanford University Press.
Eduard Jordaan (2006). Affinities in the Socio-Political Thought of Rorty and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):193-209.
Robert E. Foelber (1994). Can an Historicist Sustain a Diehard Commitment to Liberal Democracy? The Case of Rorty's Liberal Ironist'. Southern Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):19-48.
Sterling Lynch (2007). Romantic Longings, Moral Ideals, and Democratic Priorities: On Richard Rorty's Use of the Distinction Between the Private and the Public. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):97 – 120.
Charles B. Guignon & David R. Hiley (eds.) (2003). Richard Rorty. Cambridge University Press.
Fred Abong, Quantum Irony and Classical Common Sense: Encouraging Rortian Solidarity and the Postmetaphysical Culture Through Decoherence and the Copenhagen Interpretation.
Christopher J. Voparil (2006). Richard Rorty: Politics and Vision. Rowman & Littlefield.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads1 ( #292,879 of 740,099 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,099 )
How can I increase my downloads?