David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 22 (1):35-41 (2007)
Richard Moran has argued, convincingly, in favour of the idea that there must be more than one path to access our own mental contents. The existence of those routes, one first-personal —through avowal— the other third-personal —no different to the one used to ascribe mental states to other people and to interpret their actions— is intimately connected to our capacity to respond to norms. Moran’s account allows for conflicts between first personal and third personal authorities over my own beliefs; this enable some instances of Moore-paradoxical cases to be meaningful. In this paper we reflect on the consequences of this view for the acquisition of beliefs, and argue that, as in the moral case, excessive concentration on a third-personal understanding of thought undermines the very idea of being directed to the world and of being capable to fully own our own beliefs. We suggest that maybe too much attention to epistemic virtues or to justification is misdirected and could produce beliefs that are themselves not first-personal enough
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hilan Bensusan & Manuel de Pinedo (2007). When My Own Beliefs Are Not First-Personal Enough. Theoria 22 (1):35-41.
Hilan Bensusan & Manuel De Pinedo García (2007). When My Own Beliefs Are Not First-Personal Enough. Theoria 22 (58):35-41.
Hilan Bensusan & Manuel De Pinedo (2011). Epistemic Virtues and Transparency. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):257-266.
Jason Kawall (2010). Autonomy, Agency, and the Value of Enduring Beliefs. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):pp. 107-129.
Claudia W. Ruitenberg (2011). The Trouble with Dispositions: A Critical Examination of Personal Beliefs, Professional Commitments and Actual Conduct in Teacher Education. Ethics and Education 6 (1):41 - 52.
Sebastian Gardner (2000). Psychoanalysis and the Personal/Sub-Personal Distinction. Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):96-119.
Sara Worley (1997). Belief and Consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):41-55.
Dale Lugenbehl (2007). Personal Attachment to Beliefs. Metaphilosophy 38 (1):55–70.
Nicholas Silins (2012). Judgment as a Guide to Belief. In Declan Smithies & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Introspection and Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Cynthia B. Cohen (2007). Ways of Being Personal and Not Being Personal About Religious Beliefs in the Clinical Setting. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (7):16 – 18.
Jennifer Hornsby (2000). Personal and Sub-Personal: A Defence of Dennett's Early Distinction. Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):6-24.
Matthew Elton (2000). Consciousness: Only at the Personal Level. Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):25-42.
Raimo Tuomela (1992). Group Beliefs. Synthese 91 (3):285-318.
Kathy Behrendt (2003). Despair, Liberation and Everyday Life: Two Bundle Views of Personal Identity. Richmond Journal of Philosophy 1 (5):32-37.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads2 ( #348,772 of 1,101,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #177,254 of 1,101,143 )
How can I increase my downloads?