Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (8):94-101 (2008)
|Abstract||From Plato's eidos, to Descartes' cogito, to Kant's numenon, our understanding of reality has faltered at a seemingly impossible, double-edged, impasse. First, an ontological 'hard problem': If mind and matter are so radically different and separate, how do they ever interact? Second, a related epistemological conundrum: How is it possible for mind to ever know anything about matter--including whether it even exists? Then came Whitehead. By shifting the mind-matter relation from substances interacting in space to complementary phases in process, he offered a way through, or at least around, the Kantian impasse. His panpsychist ontology came hand-in-glove with an epistemology of intersubjectivity: We can know the objective physical world because the actual world is not just physical, and because it necessarily and intimately informs and constitutes our subjective experience. But is this panpsychism or idealism? And how does it avoid the interaction problem that bedevils dualism or the problem of emergence that embarrasses materialism?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Howard Robinson, Dualism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
William M. Kallfelz (2009). Physical Emergence and Process Ontology. World Futures 65 (1):42 – 60.
Howard M. Robinson (2002). Dualism. In Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
H. Groot (1936). Het Wezen Van de Materie. Synthese 1 (1):247 - 251.
Fiona Ellis (2011). God, Value, and Naturalism. Ratio 24 (2):138-153.
Jan-Markus Schwindt (2008). Mind as Hardware and Matter as Software. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (4):5-27.
Georg Franck (2008). Presence and Reality: An Option to Specify Panpsychism ? Mind and Matter 6 (1):123-140.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #49,684 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 551,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?