Graduate studies at Western
OUP Oxford (2010)
|Abstract||While much has been written on Descartes' theory of mind and ideas, no systematic study of his theory of sensory representation and misrepresentation is currently available in the literature. Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Misrepresentation is an ambitious attempt to fill this gap. It argues against the established view that Cartesian sensations are mere qualia by defending the view that they are representational; it offers a descriptivist-causal account of their representationality that is critical of, and differs from, all other extant accounts (such as, for example, causal, teleofunctional and purely internalist accounts); and it has the advantage of providing an adequate solution to the problem of sensory misrepresentation within Descartes' internalist theory of ideas. In sum, the book offers a novel account of the representationality of Cartesian sensations; provides a panoramic overview, and critical assessment, of the scholarly literature on this issue; and places Descartes' theory of sensation in the central position it deserves among the philosophical and scientific investigations of the workings of the human mind.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$34.23 new (43% off) $51.85 direct from Amazon (14% off) $73.89 used Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Raffaella De Rosa (2009). Cartesian Sensations. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):780-792.
Alison Simmons (2003). Descartes on the Cognitive Structure of Sensory Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):549–579.
Raffaella De Rosa (2007). A Teleological Account of Cartesian Sensations? Synthese 156 (2):311-336.
Raffaella De Rosa (2007). A Teleological Account of Cartesian Sensations? Synthese 156 (2):311 - 336.
Raffaella De Rosa (2013). Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation: Précis. Analytic Philosophy 54 (1):93-96.
Tom Vinci (2013). Raffaella De Rosa's Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation. Analytic Philosophy 54 (1):97-106.
Deborah J. Brown (2006). Descartes and the Passionate Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Raffaella De Rosa (2004). Descartes on Sensory Misrepresentation: The Case of Materially False Ideas. History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (3):261 - 280.
Richard A. Watson (2010). Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):526-527.
Gregg Caruso (2005). Sensory States, Consciousness, and the Cartesian Assumption. In Nathan Smith and Jason Taylor (ed.), Descartes and Cartesianism. Cambridge Scholars Press.
John Cottingham (ed.) (1994). Reason, Will, and Sensation: Studies in Descartes's Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Antonia Lolordo (2005). Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
Raffaella de Rosa (2007). The Myth of Cartesian Qualia. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):181ï¿½207.
Thomas C. Vinci (1998). Cartesian Truth. Oxford University Press.
Monima Chadha (2009). Contents of Experience. Sophia 48 (3):237-251.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads6 ( #154,981 of 738,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?