Functional differences: comparing moral judgement developmental phases of consolidation and transition
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 34 (1):89-106 (2005)
Applying Snyder and Feldman's 1984 consolidation?transition model to moral judgement development has enabled further understanding of how moral judgement translates to moral functioning. In this study, 178 college students were identified as being in consolidated versus transitional phases of moral judgement development using Rest's Defining Issues Test (DIT). Participant moral functioning was inferred through an honest decision?making index along with Attitudes Towards Human Rights Inventory (ATHRI) and Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) scores. Multivariate Analyses of Variance revealed that the consolidated group was significantly more honest than the transitional group. No differences attributable to moral judgement phase were seen for ATHRI and VFI scores. Findings support the claim that consolidated phases improve the explanatory power of moral judgement for certain moral functional outcomes?particularly those involving ambiguity and minimal time for decision?making
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maike Albertzart (2013). Principle-Based Moral Judgement. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):339-354.
Dennis L. Krebs, Kathy Denton & Gillian Wark (1997). The Forms and Functions of Real‐Life Moral Decision‐Making. Journal of Moral Education 26 (2):131-145.
Patricia M. King & Matthew J. Mayhew (2002). Moral Judgement Development in Higher Education: Insights From the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):247-270.
Wilton H. Bunch (2005). Changing Moral Judgement in Divinity Students. Journal of Moral Education 34 (3):363-370.
Darcia Narvaez & Tonia Bock (2002). Moral Schemas and Tacit Judgement or How the Defining Issues Test is Supported by Cognitive Science. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):297-314.
Patricia J. Craig & Sharon Nodie Oja (2012). Moral Judgement Changes Among Undergraduates in a Capstone Internship Experience. Journal of Moral Education 42 (1):43-70.
Chadwick W. Royal & Stanley B. Baker (2005). Effects of a Deliberate Moral Education Program on Parents of Elementary School Students. Journal of Moral Education 34 (2):215-230.
Sally I. Powers (1988). Moral Judgement Development Within the Family. Journal of Moral Education 17 (3):209-219.
Grace Livingstone, W. Pitt Derryberry, Amanda King & Michael Vendetti (2006). Moral Developmental Consistency? Investigating Differences and Relationships Among Academic Majors. Ethics and Behavior 16 (3):265 – 287.
Stephen J. Thoma (2002). An Overview of the Minnesota Approach to Research in Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):225-245.
Garrett Cullity (2006). As You Were? Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):117 – 132.
Judith A. Maccallum (1993). Teacher Reasoning and Moral Judgement in the Context of Student Discipline Situations. Journal of Moral Education 22 (1):3-17.
Michael J. Pardales (2002). "So, How Did You Arrive at That Decision?" Connecting Moral Imagination and Moral Judgement. Journal of Moral Education 31 (4):423-437.
Muriel J. Bebeau (2002). The Defining Issues Test and the Four Component Model: Contributions to Professional Education. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):271-295.
Fiona A. White (1996). Sources of Influence in Moral Thought: The New Moral Authority Scale. Journal of Moral Education 25 (4):421-439.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads6 ( #223,445 of 1,413,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #152,603 of 1,413,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?