Graduate studies at Western
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):31-62 (1996)
|Abstract||This article examines the role of philosophy in the development of the kinetic theory of gases. Two opposing accounts of this role, by Peter Clark and John Nyhof, are discussed and criticized. Contrary to both accounts, it is argued that philosophical views of scientists can fundamentally influence the results of their scientific work. This claim is supported by a detailed analysis of the philosophical views of Maxwell and Boltzmann, and of their work on the kinetic theory, especially concerning the so-called specific heat anomaly. It leads to the conclusion that the scientific development of the kinetic theory cannot be understood without taking into account the role of philosophy.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeffry L. Ramsey (1992). Towards an Expanded Epistemology for Approximations. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:154 - 164.
Lionel G. Harrison (2005). Kinetic Theory of Living Pattern. Cambridge University Press.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (1982). The Reduction of Phenomenological to Kinetic Thermostatics. Philosophy of Science 49 (1):107-119.
Peter Achinstein (1987). Scientific Discovery and Maxwell's Kinetic Theory. Philosophy of Science 54 (3):409-434.
Henk W. Regt (2005). Scientific Realism in Action: Molecular Models and Boltzmann's Bildtheorie. Erkenntnis 63 (2):205 - 230.
John Nyhof (1988). Philosophical Objections to the Kinetic Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1):81-109.
Henk W. De Regt (1996). Philosophy and the Kinetic Theory of Gases. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):31 - 62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,570 of 739,346 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,346 )
How can I increase my downloads?