The seven strategies of the sophisticated pseudo-scientist: A look into Freud's rhetorical tool box [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 32 (2):329-350 (2001)
In my ‘Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science’ (Journal for General Philosophy of Science 1993) I argued against Grünbaum that Freud commits all Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science. Yet how does Freud manage to fool many people, including such a sophisticated person as Grünbaum? My answer is that Freud is a sophisticated pseudo-scientist, using all Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist to keep up appearances, to wit, (1) the Humble Empiricist, (2) the Severe Selfcriticism, (3) the Unbiased Me, (4) the Striking but Irrelevant Example, (5) the Proof Given Elsewhere, (6) the Favorable Compromise, and (7) the Display of Methodological Sophistication. One should note that not all strategies are disreputable in themselves. But all are used very cunningly so as to hide weaknesses in Freud's arguments. To be fair, quite a few of his methodological remarks are sophisticated enough. As Freud combines these sophisticated remarks with an appalling methodology in practice, I call him a sophisticated pseudo-scientist. I do not claim that these rhetorical strategies are specific to him.
|Keywords||pseudo-science rhetorical strategies humbleempiricism sophisticated pseudo-scientist Freud|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sven Ove Hansson (2009). Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):237-243.
Sven Ove Hansson (2008). Philosophy as Mere Rhetoric? Theoria 74 (4):267-270.
Similar books and articles
Barbara Klunder (2000). Varieties of Pseudo-Interior Algebras. Studia Logica 65 (1):113-136.
Adolf Grünbaum (1977). Is Psychoanalysis a Pseudo-Science? Karl Popper Versus Sigmund Freud. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 31 (3):333 - 353.
A. A. Derksen (1992). Does the Tally Argument Make Freud a Sophisticated Methodologist? Philosophy of Science 59 (1):75-101.
A. A. Derksen (1993). The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24 (1):17 - 42.
V. L. Jupp (1977). Freud and Pseudo-Science. Philosophy 52 (202):441 - 453.
Richard R. Askay (1999). A Philosophical Dialogue Between Heidegger and Freud. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:415-443.
Eric Dietrich (2000). Cognitive Science and the Mechanistic Forces of Darkness, or Why the Computational Science of Mind Suffers the Slings and Arrows of Outrageous Fortune. Techné 5 (2):73-82.
Donald Levy (1988). Gr Nbaum's Freud. Inquiry 31 (2):193 – 215.
Barbara Klunder (2003). Amalgamation in Varieties of Pseudo-Interior Algebras. Studia Logica 73 (3):431 - 443.
Anthony A. Derksen (2005). Dennett's Rhetorical Strategies in Consciousness Explained. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (1):29-48.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #44,570 of 1,096,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #106,677 of 1,096,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?