Historicity and experimental evolution

Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):339-364 (2011)
Abstract
Biologists in the last 50 years have increasingly emphasized the role of historical contingency in explaining the distribution and dynamics of biological systems. However, recent work in philosophy of biology has shown that historical contingency carries various interpretations and that we are still lacking a general understanding of historicity, i.e., a framework from which to interpret why and to what extent history matters in biological processes. Building from examples and analyses of the long-term experimental evolution (LTEE) project, this paper argues that historicity possess three essential conditions: (1) multiple possible pasts, (2) multiple possible outcomes at a given instant, and (3) a relationship of causal dependence between these two sets. These criteria can be further specified in two general forms of historicity: dependence on initial conditions and path dependence. More attention is devoted to developing a rigorous account of the latter, which captures the type of historicity displayed by stochastic processes. This paper also highlights that it is often more productive to adopt an instant-relative approach and think in terms of degree of historicity instead of trying to maintain a rigid and absolute dichotomy between historical and ahistorical (completely convergent) processes
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,738
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John Beatty (2006). Replaying Life's Tape. Journal of Philosophy 103 (7):336-362.

View all 10 references

Citations of this work BETA
Trevor Pearce (2012). Philosophy of Biology in the Twenty-First Century. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (1):312-315.
Marc Ereshefsky (2012). Homology Thinking. Biology and Philosophy 27 (3):381-400.
Patrick Forber (2012). Conjecture and Explanation: A Reply to Reydon. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (1):298-301.
Similar books and articles
Eva-Maria Engelen (2010). Husserl, History, and Consciousness. In David Hyder & Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), Science and the Life-World. Stanford University Press.
Mohan Matthen (2013). Millikan's Historical Kinds. In Dan Ryder, Justine Kingsbury & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Millikan and Her Critics. John Wiley & Sons. 135--154.
Christopher Grau (2010). Love and History. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):246-271.
Joseph Margolis (2007). Historicity and the Politics of Predication. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):79-100.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-03-16

Total downloads

35 ( #48,390 of 1,098,785 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #26,714 of 1,098,785 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.