Graduate studies at Western
Noûs 42 (4):746-752 (2008)
|Abstract||Kilimanjaro is a paradigmatic mountain, if any is. Consider atom Sparky, which is neither determinately part of Kilimanjaro nor determinately not part of it. Let Kilimanjaro(+) be the body of land constituted, in the way mountains are constituted by their constituent atoms, by the atoms that make up Kilimanjaro together with Sparky, and Kilimanjaro(–) the one constituted by those other than Sparky. On the one hand, there seems to be just one mountain in the vicinity of Kilimanjaro. On the other hand, both Kilimanjaro(+) and Kilimanjaro(–)—and indeed many other similar things—seem to have an equal claim to be a mountain: all of them exhibit the grounds for something being a mountain—like being an elevation of the earth’s surface rising abruptly and to a large height from the surrounding level,1 or whathaveyou—; and there seems to be nothing in the vicinity with a better claim. Hence, the problem of the many|
|Keywords||vagueness problem of the many|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dominic Hyde (1994). Why Higher-Order Vagueness is a Pseudo-Problem. Mind 103 (409):35-41.
Peter Lewis (1995). GRW and the Tails Problem. Topoi 14 (1):23-33.
Thomas Hofweber (2009). The Meta-Problem of Change. Noûs 43 (2):286 - 314.
Neil McKinnon (2002). Supervaluations and the Problem of the Many. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (208):320-339.
Robert Williams (2006). An Argument for the Many. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):411-419.
Dan López de Sa (2008). Is the Problem of the Many a Problem in Metaphysics? Noûs 42 (4):746 - 752.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #30,853 of 738,966 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,337 of 738,966 )
How can I increase my downloads?